Every few weeks it's the same post. Over and over again. You are beating a dead horse.
He's only been slumping a couple weeks, not an entire month.
What's YOUR obsession with his s***** stats? You complain about 244 AVG, .304 OB, .454 SLG, .758 OPS. over and over again. You claim it's "terrible in any year" That's not a terrible line for a CATCHER splitting time. He's not a starter.
You keep bringing up how other catchers are s***** too which doesn't even help your case. What do you seriously expect the Red Sox to do? What where their options during the offseason? Tell me. As far as I know it was stay with Salty who could perform fine (which he is doing now no matter how hard you deny it) or get Russell Martin which would take a good amount of money and a high risk. I heard the name John Buck thrown around too, I'm sure we'd all would love to have his .227 .319 .390 .710 line and .08 WAR. Or maybe we could of gotten Ivan Rodriguez' 30 games played and .214 .276 .325 .600. instead.
It just makes no sense to constantly bump the same thread every few weeks just to repeat yourself like a broken record about a guy who is doing fine at one of the worst offensive positions in the game. I could understand if we are complaining about truly bad players like some of our bench players or J.D Drew or even Crawford who are performing at a level lower than average to those in their category, but this is just asinine. You people have been spolied by early 2000's Varitek too much, and by the steroid era of hard hitting catchers. Gonna have to deal with the fact that for a while we are going to have to deal with either our catcher being a defensive specialist with a s*** bat or a catcher with decent hitting skills and slightly below to average defense, like Salty. Get used to it.
Oh and just as a side note here I realized while thinking about this and mentioning the steroid era... Ever notice it was the season after MLB instituted a steroid policy with suspensions that Varitek immediately plunged offensively and started getting injured a bit? Seriously. 2006. I know correlation does not equal causation but it is interesting.