TK, as always, nicely done. Hopefully your posts can spark some solid debate, as, I'm sure most would agree, this is a great time of year to be a sports' fan.
I'm with you on three of your four regional winners (the three one seeds).
Syracuse, as you mentioned, finished slow, but they really remind me of the 2003 team. They can play inside, the point guard is young, but solid, and they have a go to player (Wesley Johnson isn't Carmelo, but he is a special player). They're well coached, and the zone, for most of the year, has looked fantastic.
Kansas is experienced with Collins and Aldrich, and with Morris and Taylor contributing on both ends, I feel like they'll take advantage of their easy road (which you also mentioned).
Kentucky really scares me, when you consider all the close games they play, the fact that they struggle at times in the half court, and the off nights that Cousins has from time to time. But, as you alluded to, it's hard to pick against all that talent, and I'm just not high enough on WVU to pick the upset.
Now, I'm sure I'm in the same boat as most people, in that I'm having trouble with the South. Clearly this comes from the fact that most people probably view Duke as the weakest number one, and, at this point, no one trusts Duke in the tournament (including myself). Baylor-Villanova probably represents the most intriguing game in the region, and when you consider how Villanova finished the year, and the way Baylor has played against the toughest competition in the Big 12, conventional wisdom would probably say to pick Baylor.
But in the end, when you're talking about two teams who play at similar levels (in my opinion), I have a hard time picking against the best player on the floor. I feel the same way about a potential Ohio State-Georgetown matchup.