Lombard just had a very strange-looking play to end the game vs. the Twins. Bottom 13, tied 4-4, no one out, ghost runner on 2nd. Victor Caratini hits a 75-ish mph grounder right up the middle – like mathematically up the middle – I think it eventually went over the 2nd base bag. The ghost runner breaks for third, obviously. Lombard charges it and makes a decision to field it in front of the bag rather than letting it get behind the bag, which would have given him more time. As it is, he whiffs entirely on the attempt to field the ball, it trickles into CF, the ghost runner scores, game over. (Scored as a game-winning RBI single, naturally.)
I know we talk about the route an outfielder takes to a ball, but this was the first time I've ever thought about the "route" an infielder took. It seems pretty clear to me that if he just let the ball come to him behind the bag, he makes the play, gets the batter-runner out, and holds the ghost-runner at 3rd. By making this weird curling route to field the ball where he did, he ended up failing completely. Odd. Was he just trying to field the ball in front of the bag to ward off any chance of it actually striking the bag (which it didn't, but he couldn't have known that)?