Oh, but he has better numbers than Roger Clemens?
He throws 87 mph. He's a two pitch pitcher, pitching in the toughest division in baseball. Is it any shock to why his numbers continue to slip?
You know what's hillarious. You're touting that Roger Clemens is better than three fringe MLB starters. He should be. A $28 million pitcher should be miles better than those three. I don't care if Roger Clemens is better than Tavarez, he wasn't paid to be better than him. He was paid to be the best pitcher on that pitching staff. He's not doing it, and he never will.
Seriously, I would be pissed off if Roger Clemens was the fifth best starter on the Red Sox.
Why do you make this point? The banality of this riposte is pathetic.
Great.
Again, you resort to saying Clemens is better than Tavarez. Good for Roger Clemens. Is that going to make a difference in a World Series run?
You know what, forget it. You have no idea of what you're talking about. You obviously only pay attention to the 25 guys on the major league roster, and have no idea how the MLB Draft works. Have you ever looked at a budget? If you spend $28 million dollars, you spent $28 million dollars. Whether it cuts into your profits, or forces you to cut spending for other programs short, you are without $28 million dollars you had.
This concept isn't hard. I don't see why you can't grasp it.