I think some of the blame has to come down on Management. I mean, Theo and the others apparently think with the amount of payroll and tallent, that this team can win regardless of who's managing. They pick inexperienced candidates for manager (Grady) or guys who'll help them sway a free agent to come to Boston (Francona). Who did they interview last year to replace Grady? Glenn Hoffman?? Some bench guy from Seattle?
Anyway, they obviously don't think a quality manager is as important to have as a guy who can protect his players and deal with the Boston media.
Of course, there is some truth to that logic - especially in the regular season. The Sox will have won 190 games over the 2003 and 2004 regular season. But come playoff time - and short series, managing becomes a much bigger aspect of the game.
I just don't get what they are thinking. You can win with a flawed pitching staff, flawed offense or a flawed bullpen if they are managed correctly. But you can have all the pieces in the world and it will do you no good if they are managed poorly. :thumbdown: