Official College Basketball Thread

[See Red]

Thats the huge misconception about him. He's not a 1 dimensional player like McNamera. He scores every way possible, plays good defense, and is the leader of this team. Adam Morrison has put up some big numbers but name 1 other player on Gonzaga. JJ could score 60 if there wasn't anyone on the team to pass to. Morrison is a good player but the lack of talent around him makes him waaaaaaay overrated. It's easy to be a super star with no one else on your team.

 

Without the talent around him, J.J. would also face the defensive pressure that Adam Morrison probably faces. Haven't you learned from Duke busts past? Guys like Trajan Langdon?

[MC Hammer]

Without the talent around him, J.J. would also face the defensive pressure that Adam Morrison probably faces. Haven't you learned from Duke busts past? Guys like Trajan Langdon?

? Trajan Langdon was one of the better players in Duke history ... how is he a bust? How can JJ possibly be a bust when he'll finish in the top 10 scoring all time at Duke?

 

Also JJ already faces double teams, and the teams best defender every single night ... so maybe try another argument.

[Manny Goes Boom]

Without the talent around him, J.J. would also face the defensive pressure that Adam Morrison probably faces. Haven't you learned from Duke busts past? Guys like Trajan Langdon?

 

Or guys who shined in Duke history...a la Jason Williams, Daniel Ewing, Mike Dunleavy, Elton Brand, Corey Maggette and more. Morrison's a great player, but so is JJ. End of story.

[See Red]

I'm saying what have they done outside of Duke's system? How many Duke 'superstars' have gone on to be successful in the NBA? That's where Trajan Langdon comes in. 3 years in the league, averaging about 5 points. Hell, even Jay Williams was a mediocre NBA player.

 

And no, Redick doesn't face the type of pressure you say he does because of Sheldon Williams downlow. Adam Morrison doesn't have the type of guy that few people in the country and guard 1 on 1 downlow.

[Manny Goes Boom]

I'm saying what have they done outside of Duke's system? How many Duke 'superstars' have gone on to be successful in the NBA? That's where Trajan Langdon comes in. 3 years in the league, averaging about 5 points. Hell, even Jay Williams was a mediocre NBA player.

 

And no, Redick doesn't face the type of pressure you say he does because of Sheldon Williams downlow. Adam Morrison doesn't have the type of guy that few people in the country and guard 1 on 1 downlow.

 

Elton Brand is a superstar in my book, only reason he doesn't get any props is because of where he plays. Pretty much the same with Corey. Mike Dunleavy is having a very nice year this year and can only get better. Jason Williams would be absolutely DESTROYING the NBA right now if he didn't get in that wreck. But your thinking past the college level and if you wanna go there thats fine.

 

Anyway your right though...JJ has Shelden but he still gets it done, and that just says how dangerous Duke really is.

[See Red]

That's how you judge how great a player really is -- how they do against the best of the best. Look at how many McDonalds All-Americans have gone through Duke in recent years. Now... how many turned into great NBA players? 1 or 2? The rest may have the occassional decent year, but even Jay Williams was mediocre as a rookie, even for a rookie's standards. I don't think we can assume that he'd be tearing apart the league -- because i don't think he would.

 

I still don't think Duke is the best team in the country. Duke hasn't looked good to me, so far. Not like the #1 team anyway -- and I find more negatives in that win over VT than positives. Give me the team that, without their starting PG, won a tournament, the Maui Invitational, that consisted of teams like Michigan State, Arizona, Kansas, Maryland, and Gonzaga.

[Manny Goes Boom]

That's how you judge how great a player really is -- how they do against the best of the best. Look at how many McDonalds All-Americans have gone through Duke in recent years. Now... how many turned into great NBA players? 1 or 2? The rest may have the occassional decent year, but even Jay Williams was mediocre as a rookie, even for a rookie's standards. I don't think we can assume that he'd be tearing apart the league -- because i don't think he would.

 

I still don't think Duke is the best team in the country. Duke hasn't looked good to me, so far. Not like the #1 team anyway -- and I find more negatives in that win over VT than positives. Give me the team that, without their starting PG, won a tournament, the Maui Invitational, that consisted of teams like Michigan State, Arizona, Kansas, Maryland, and Gonzaga.

 

LMAO of course you would want your OWN team. OK, that field is lets say "OVERRATED" (As the Houston fans said as they were routing Arizona 20-4 in the first half of the game they WON!) Michigan State ALWAYS starts highly ranked then loses to s*** teams (Hawaii) and the loses pile up (Gonzaga, a very good team but w/e). Kansas...umm who? Maryland always plays Duke hard I'll give them that. And Gonzaga is good but UConn SHOULD have won that tourney. Duke has injuries, and JJ was in foul trouble in the VT game. Yeah blowing a team out by 60 isn't looking good.

[MC Hammer]

That's how you judge how great a player really is -- how they do against the best of the best. Look at how many McDonalds All-Americans have gone through Duke in recent years. Now... how many turned into great NBA players? 1 or 2? The rest may have the occassional decent year, but even Jay Williams was mediocre as a rookie, even for a rookie's standards. I don't think we can assume that he'd be tearing apart the league -- because i don't think he would.

 

I still don't think Duke is the best team in the country. Duke hasn't looked good to me, so far. Not like the #1 team anyway -- and I find more negatives in that win over VT than positives. Give me the team that, without their starting PG, won a tournament, the Maui Invitational, that consisted of teams like Michigan State, Arizona, Kansas, Maryland, and Gonzaga.

 

No you judge a player against his current competition. Who cares how good JJ will be in the NBA? Right now he's the best player in college.

 

Grant Hill - STAR

Correy Magette - STAR

Elton Brand - STAR

Carlos Boozer - STAR

Mike Dunleavy - Contributer

Chris Duhon - Contributer

Luol Deng - Contributer

 

Just off the top of my head thats pretty good for just recent players. How many player from your college team are stars or even contributers to NBA teams?

[See Red]

No you judge a player against his current competition. Who cares how good JJ will be in the NBA? Right now he's the best player in college.

 

Grant Hill - STAR

Correy Magette - STAR

Elton Brand - STAR

Carlos Boozer - STAR

Mike Dunleavy - Contributer

Chris Duhon - Contributer

Luol Deng - Contributer

 

Just off the top of my head thats pretty good for just recent players. How many player from your college team are stars or even contributers to NBA teams?

 

Ray Allen, Rip Hamilton, Emeka Okafor, Ben Gordon, Donyell Marshall, Caron Butler, Charlie Villanueva. The top 4 are stars, and the top 2 are elite players in the League. Yet, my school doesn't have 8 or 9 McDonald's All-Americans at any point in time.

 

Dunleavy was a #3 pick... you don't look for a contributor at #3... feel free to label him as a bust.

 

For every Grant Hill, there's been multiple Christian Laettners. For every Elton Brand there's been a Trajan Langdon.

 

I'm saying judge 'em in the pros when they don't have 7 more All-Americans on their team than anybody else. You say he's the greatest, I say without the talent on Duke, he doesn't get half the looks he gets.

[See Red]

LMAO of course you would want your OWN team. OK, that field is lets say "OVERRATED" (As the Houston fans said as they were routing Arizona 20-4 in the first half of the game they WON!) Michigan State ALWAYS starts highly ranked then loses to s*** teams (Hawaii) and the loses pile up (Gonzaga, a very good team but w/e). Kansas...umm who? Maryland always plays Duke hard I'll give them that. And Gonzaga is good but UConn SHOULD have won that tourney. Duke has injuries, and JJ was in foul trouble in the VT game. Yeah blowing a team out by 60 isn't looking good.

 

I'd take my own team not because they're my own team. I've only picked my team to legitimately compete for the NCAA Championship in 1999 and 2004. Hell, I'd take Villanova and Texas over Duke too -- because like your excuse practically said, J.J. (Or Sheldon, for that matter) get in foul trouble and Duke is done in the tournament. And yes, a tournament which is referred to as one of the best fields ever (NCAA Tournaments obviously excluded) is very overrated. A tournament with 5 top 25 teams, and 4 preseason top 10 teams is very overrated. Basically, your tournament is pretty damn good when you can say that one of the weakest links is Kansas.

 

Which of Duke's wins should impress me? Seton Hall? Seton Hall's been taken to the wire by Marist and Farleigh Dickinson. In other words, they no good. That doesn't seem much different than UConn killing Texas Southern by 64, I'm not going to preorder my 2005-06 NCAA Champions shirt because of it.

 

You say that UConn should've won that tournament as a way to dismiss their accomplishment, then your response to Duke being overrated is that they're undefeated. Duke SHOULD win those games -- so by your logic, they don't matter.

[MC Hammer]

Ray Allen, Rip Hamilton, Emeka Okafor, Ben Gordon, Donyell Marshall, Caron Butler, Charlie Villanueva. The top 4 are stars, and the top 2 are elite players in the League. Yet, my school doesn't have 8 or 9 McDonald's All-Americans at any point in time.

 

Dunleavy was a #3 pick... you don't look for a contributor at #3... feel free to label him as a bust.

 

For every Grant Hill, there's been multiple Christian Laettners. For every Elton Brand there's been a Trajan Langdon.

 

I'm saying judge 'em in the pros when they don't have 7 more All-Americans on their team than anybody else. You say he's the greatest, I say without the talent on Duke, he doesn't get half the looks he gets.

Again like I said WHO CARES WHAT DUKE PLAYERS DO IN THE NBA? Maybe UConn fans see things differently, but I root for Duke. I don't root for individuals, and I dont really care what they do in the NBA. Furthermore, how can you judge someone based on where he was drafted? Did he draft himself? Did Dunleavy say ... I'm a 3rd pick! No ... he got drafted where he got drafted ... he had no choice.

 

You can keep saying that the NBA is the only way to gauge how good a player is and I'll keep telling you it doesn't make sense. JJ is the best player in COLLEGE BASKETBALL. Not basketball period. COLLEGE BASKETBALL. This has absolutly nothing to do with the NBA in any way.

[See Red]

Again like I said WHO CARES WHAT DUKE PLAYERS DO IN THE NBA? Maybe UConn fans see things differently, but I root for Duke. I don't root for individuals, and I dont really care what they do in the NBA. Furthermore, how can you judge someone based on where he was drafted? Did he draft himself? Did Dunleavy say ... I'm a 3rd pick! No ... he got drafted where he got drafted ... he had no choice.

 

You can keep saying that the NBA is the only way to gauge how good a player is and I'll keep telling you it doesn't make sense. JJ is the best player in COLLEGE BASKETBALL. Not basketball period. COLLEGE BASKETBALL. This has absolutly nothing to do with the NBA in any way.

 

I don't understand why it's so difficult for you to understand what I'm saying. Like almost every other Duke 'star' -- all of which were thought to be among the best players in the country -- they're a product of the system. They're nothing without the system. You want to argue that Morrison wouldn't be as good with the talent that Reddick has around him -- why can't I basically say the same thing about Reddick in that he wouldn't be as good without as much talent around him and without Coach K's system like most Duke players past?

 

That's the argument. It's alright for you to say that Morrison is good because of the situation he's in, but I can't argue the same about Reddick?

[MC Hammer]

I don't understand why it's so difficult for you to understand what I'm saying. Like almost every other Duke 'star' -- all of which were thought to be among the best players in the country -- they're a product of the system. They're nothing without the system. You want to argue that Morrison wouldn't be as good with the talent that Reddick has around him -- why can't I basically say the same thing about Reddick in that he wouldn't be as good without as much talent around him and without Coach K's system like most Duke players past?

 

That's the argument. It's alright for you to say that Morrison is good because of the situation he's in, but I can't argue the same about Reddick?

You can, but your not talking about the situation Reddick is in. You're talking about the situation Reddick will be in next year. If you want to talk about how he wouldn't be as successfull at a different college go ahead, but talking about how he'll be a "bust" in the NBA is in no way the same.

[See Red]

You can, but your not talking about the situation Reddick is in. You're talking about the situation Reddick will be in next year. If you want to talk about how he wouldn't be as successfull at a different college go ahead, but talking about how he'll be a "bust" in the NBA is in no way the same.

 

No, the reason I bring past Duke players and what they've done in the NBA into this is to prove my very point that "they're a product of the system. They're nothing (bad word to use, though) without the system." At some point you have to look at all the guys that were phenomenal at Duke, that amounted to very little outside of the system and assume that they weren't as talented as they were made out to be because that's more likely to be the case than that they just forgot how to play. I see J.J. Reddick as being no different.

[MC Hammer]

No, the reason I bring past Duke players and what they've done in the NBA into this is to prove my very point that "they're a product of the system. They're nothing (bad word to use, though) without the system." At some point you have to look at all the guys that were phenomenal at Duke, that amounted to very little outside of the system and assume that they weren't as talented as they were made out to be because that's more likely to be the case than that they just forgot how to play. I see J.J. Reddick as being no different.

Well, look at all the guys who have been stars in college and not in the NBA. It's not like Duke is the only college that has stars who don't make it in the NBA. Not all of the McDonalds All Americans go to Duke. The success rate from NCAA to NBA is very low so to just point out Duke doesn't make sense. There are atleast a dozen of college stars moving on to the NBA every year and how many of them actually work out? Exactly. A lot of people like to point at Duke and say "well they haven't had much success in the NBA" but the fact is no college has a great success rate.

 

You're just a typical Duke hater trying to find anyway you can to put Duke, and it's players, down.

 

You can talk s*** when UConn dominates college basketball for a decade.

[See Red]

You're just a typical Duke hater trying to find anyway you can to put Duke, and it's players, down.

 

You can talk s*** when UConn dominates college basketball for a decade.

 

Won't happen. UConn doesn't get to play practically every game on National Television. UConn doesn't get the respect that Duke gets (Particularly from officials, but that's beside the point) from the National Media, even though ESPN is in CT. If you want to argue that, tell me why ESPn didn't get all over coach K after that Nationally televised Recruiting... err... Mastercard commercial. And I guarentee you that Duke has more McDonalds All-Americans than any other team in the country (edit: with the exception of UNC, maybe) -- more than UConn by, what I imagine, is a pretty large amount.

 

You act like it's my fault that you have the uncanny ability to not recognize when a player is in a system or on a team that benefits them.

[MC Hammer]

Won't happen. UConn doesn't get to play practically every game on National Television. UConn doesn't get the respect that Duke gets (Particularly from officials, but that's beside the point) from the National Media, even though ESPN is in CT. If you want to argue that, tell me why ESPn didn't get all over coach K after that Nationally televised Recruiting... err... Mastercard commercial. And I guarentee you that Duke has more McDonalds All-Americans than any other team in the country -- more than UConn by, what I imagine, is a pretty large amount.

 

You act like it's my fault that you have the uncanny ability to not recognize when a player is in a system or on a team that benefits them.

Yeah gee Coach K is really a bad person for being the best college basketball coach in history. The reason Duke is the most respected college and most televised is because they're a great team every year. To gain favoritism from the media you have to win, and that’s what Duke does. This isn't like pro sports so you can't blame it on money. Why do you think all these McDonalds All Americans want to go to Duke? Hmmm ... maybe it's because Coach K is a great coach and Duke is a great program. You're basically knocking Duke for being great ... makes no sense.

 

I'd like to ask another question. If all these great Duke stars are just a product of the system then why have players come to Duke and not been stars? By your theory, every player that comes to Duke should be a God, because of the system, but thats not how it is.

 

JJ came to Duke as exactly the same player as McNamara ... he could shoot, and that’s it. Then he added everything to his game over his 3 years at Duke, and has become a complete player. If he was just a product of a system then he would be exactly like McNamara and he'd only be able to shoot, because that would have been his role in the system.

 

BTW every single player on every single team in every single sport is the product of a system. Every team has a system so they all have to be a product of it. Do you think Ortiz would put up the numbers he does if he was on a team with a small ball system? No he wouldn't. So yeah you can say JJ is a product of the system, but so is every player. Funny how our system has been rotating different players in to do completely different things at the same position this year ... must be some alternate system when we change lineups, huh?

 

BTW I don’t see why UConn can't get the best recruits. ESPN kisses their asses and overrates them every single year, and they get plenty of play on TV. If UConn can't get good recruits that’s not Duke's fault, not Coach K's fault, and it's not my fault, it's your coaches fault for not being a better recruiter.

 

If shooting when your open and playing tough D is a system then yes JJ is a product of the system. That is our "system". Duke doesn't even run plays on offense, they just get people open and shoot. Please explain what kind of "system" you think Duke runs.

[See Red]

Yeah gee Coach K is really a bad person for being the best college basketball coach in history. The reason Duke is the most respected college and most televised is because they're a great team every year. To gain favoritism from the media you have to win, and that’s what Duke does. This isn't like pro sports so you can't blame it on money. Why do you think all these McDonalds All Americans want to go to Duke? Hmmm ... maybe it's because Coach K is a great coach and Duke is a great program. You're basically knocking Duke for being great ... makes no sense.

 

Thank you for putting words in my mouth. I never said Coach K is a bad person. I never said he wasn't the greatest coach in college basketball history. I'm not saying Duke isn't a great program.. I'm not saying it's unfair that they're only great because they get All-Americans because that's obviously the goal in recruiting. Noticing a trend, here? I'm starting to question whether or not you even read what I've said or just skim over and come up with a stock reponse that has nothing to do with what I'm saying. My statement that Duke has more All-Americans than practically any other team was in response to you saying that not All-Americans go to Duke. Well, that much is obvious.

 

 

I'd like to ask another question. If all these great Duke stars are just a product of the system then why have players come to Duke and not been stars? By your theory, every player that comes to Duke should be a God, because of the system, but thats not how it is.

 

Not saying they can turn nobodies into stars. You need talent -- J.J. has talent, I never said he doesn't. But when teams can't key in on you in nearly the same way as they can against Morrison and you're a good player, you're going to look very good.

 

JJ came to Duke as exactly the same player as McNamara ... he could shoot, and that’s it. Then he added everything to his game over his 3 years at Duke, and has become a complete player. If he was just a product of a system then he would be exactly like McNamara and he'd only be able to shoot, because that would have been his role in the system.

 

Once again, I never said Reddick isn't a good player, and I've never said that he hasn't improved. This all started because you used Morrison's lack of talent around him -- which makes no sense. Basketball is like football in that if you're a defensive coordinator, and you know a team can't pass the ball, you'll put 8 in the box. You key in on, and stop, their strength and make them beat you another way -- teams can't do that with Duke because of Williams, and the other talent.

 

BTW I don’t see why UConn can't get the best recruits. ESPN kisses their asses and overrates them every single year, and they get plenty of play on TV. If UConn can't get good recruits that’s not Duke's fault, not Coach K's fault, and it's not my fault, it's your coaches fault for not being a better recruiter.

 

... Calhoun built the UConn program from nothing. He's won 2 national championships -- the schools first 2 national championships. You can't do that if you can't recruit -- such an ignorant statement hardly even deserves a response. ESPN doesn't overrate UConn every year. The only year I can remember them picking UConn to win the National Championship was 2003-04, when they won it. And they're not on tv nearly as often as Duke -- not out here in Colorado, anyway. I'm sure it's different out there.

 

If shooting when your open and playing tough D is a system then yes JJ is a product of the system. That is our "system". Duke doesn't even run plays on offense, they just get people open and shoot. Please explain what kind of "system" you think Duke runs.

 

I mean, the team that's around him. Sheldon Williams is a man that few players can cover one on one. You don't think that gives Reddick opportunities he otherwise wouldn't get? Open shots when the defense collapses on Williams? You don't think having Melchionni, who shot 40% from 3 last year makes it a little difficult for defense to collapse when Reddick drives? You use the lack of talent around Morrison against him? What the hell type of logic does that follow?

[JimBrown32]

Thats the huge misconception about him. He's not a 1 dimensional player like McNamera. He scores every way possible, plays good defense, and is the leader of this team. Adam Morrison has put up some big numbers but name 1 other player on Gonzaga. JJ could score 60 if there wasn't anyone on the team to pass to. Morrison is a good player but the lack of talent around him makes him waaaaaaay overrated. It's easy to be a super star with no one else on your team.

 

Actually that would probably make you underrated, when you can actually pass to someone it makes you better, you can't be serious, JJ is not the best player in the Nation, Kevin Garnett was WAY more productive with better players on his team, you can't be a superstar if you can't share the ball. Good players take total control of the ball and don't pass and put up huge numbers, but if you want to be the best in the nation you'll put up better numbers when you actually have some talent on your team.

[JimBrown32]

About the thing "When UConn dominates Basketball for a decade" Of course they won't, nobody will dominate like Duke, because for one, they get their asses kissed by the media and get all the good players because they're always televised and they'll always just be the best team. Although seems to me UConn beat Duke in the Final Four a couple years ago. Not a huge deal, but still.

[MC Hammer]

Not saying they can turn nobodies into stars. You need talent -- J.J. has talent, I never said he doesn't. But when teams can't key in on you in nearly the same way as they can against Morrison and you're a good player, you're going to look very good.

JJ gets the best defender on every team they play. He gets double teamed by almost every team as well.

 

Once again, I never said Reddick isn't a good player, and I've never said that he hasn't improved. This all started because you used Morrison's lack of talent around him -- which makes no sense. Basketball is like football in that if you're a defensive coordinator, and you know a team can't pass the ball, you'll put 8 in the box. You key in on, and stop, their strength and make them beat you another way -- teams can't do that with Duke because of Williams, and the other talent.

Ok well my point was that JJ puts up HUGE numbers with a lot of talent around him. AI leads the NBA in scoring every year because there's no one else on his team, until Cwebb this year.

 

... Calhoun built the UConn program from nothing. He's won 2 national championships -- the schools first 2 national championships. You can't do that if you can't recruit -- such an ignorant statement hardly even deserves a response. ESPN doesn't overrate UConn every year. The only year I can remember them picking UConn to win the National Championship was 2003-04, when they won it. And they're not on tv nearly as often as Duke -- not out here in Colorado, anyway. I'm sure it's different out there.

Coach K also built his program for nothing. You can be overrated without being picked to win the NC. UConn is a very good team year in and year out but I dont think they've been the top 5 team that ESPN ranks them as for the last few years.

 

I mean, the team that's around him. Sheldon Williams is a man that few players can cover one on one. You don't think that gives Reddick opportunities he otherwise wouldn't get? Open shots when the defense collapses on Williams? You don't think having Melchionni, who shot 40% from 3 last year makes it a little difficult for defense to collapse when Reddick drives? You use the lack of talent around Morrison against him? What the hell type of logic does that follow?

Of course it gives Reddick opportunities, but you didn't answer my question. Whats the Devils "system"? Get the ball inside and dish it out? That's almost every single teams gameplan. Of course having better players around you makes the game easier for you, but JJ is the driving force of the offense. There is no player on the court for Duke more important to the offense than JJ, simply because he can score from anywhere on the court ... anyway he can.

 

So again I'm gonna ask ... what is this "system" that makes me think JJ is the best player in the nation? I've been watching Duke all my life and I've yet to see a system.

[See Red]

... Hold on, I need to figure out where you're going with this concept...

 

UConn has been overrated the last few years? They won the Championship the year before last... how can they be overrated? Even last year they lost two of the best players in the country and still managed to win the Big East. I guess the AP overrates them two when they get a good preseason ranking. Please. You cheer for the team that gets their ass kissed by the media.

 

And again, i already I explained that by system, I meant the players around him. I say 'system' out of lack of a better term for it.

[MC Hammer]

About the thing "When UConn dominates Basketball for a decade" Of course they won't, nobody will dominate like Duke, because for one, they get their asses kissed by the media and get all the good players because they're always televised and they'll always just be the best team. Although seems to me UConn beat Duke in the Final Four a couple years ago. Not a huge deal, but still.

I'm sorry what does the media have to do with Duke going to atleast the elite 8 almost every year?

[See Red]

I'm sorry what does the media have to do with Duke going to atleast the elite 8 almost every year?

 

Let's see, if you had a choice between a school like Duke where almost every game can be seen Nationally, or another big conference school where they have less than half as many televised games... where would you go? And, more importantly, where do you think the majority of High Schoolers would go?

[MC Hammer]

Let's see, if you had a choice between a school like Duke where almost every game can be seen Nationally, or another big conference school where they have less than half as many televised games... where would you go? And, more importantly, where do you think the majority of High Schoolers would go?

I don't understand why being on TV would matter, and I don't think Coach K accepts players who think like that. Coach K wants players who want to win, and are committed to winning a National Championship. Have you noticed how many of Duke's stars have stayed their full 4 years? If players were only interested in getting their highlights on tv would they stay 4 years when they were a star their sophmore/junior year? No they wouldn't.

[26 to 6]

I still don't think Duke is the best team in the country.

you're right, because my Fordham Rams are going to overcome their 1-5 start and dominate the A10, then they are going to get a Tourney bid, and then advance to the Final Four, then beat Duke in the finals.

 

PLease, no insults, i'm just a lowly Rams fan who needs to get my kicks some how considering the sorry excuse for a Basketball Program we have.

 

My College Teams

Fordham Rams

St. Johns Red Storm

Manhatten College Jaspers

 

Any of those teams get a bid it will have been a good year for me.

 

OK, sorry to interupt the Duke/UConn discussion

[YanksHater213]

Ill just end this now. BC owns Duke and UConn, THERE, I win. Haha. Seriously though I think UConn is the better team once Williams is back. Once BC gets theyre Williams back I wont be surprised if we get into the top 3.

[MC Hammer]

Ill just end this now. BC owns Duke and UConn, THERE, I win. Haha. Seriously though I think UConn is the better team once Williams is back. Once BC gets theyre Williams back I wont be surprised if we get into the top 3.

I'm willing to bet anything that Duke will win the National Title this year, barring another serious injury.

[yankeessuck013]

I'm willing to bet anything that Duke will win the National Title this year, barring another serious injury.

 

anything? I don't know Villanova Looks very impressive, as does Texas.

[YanksHater213]

I'm willing to bet anything that Duke will win the National Title this year, barring another serious injury.

I was actually being sarcastic... BC is a pretty awesome team. Maybe one of the better 6th men in the country in Tyrese Rice. I wont be surprised if they go far. I dont expect them to win it all though.