Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

moonslav59

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    103,987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    129

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by moonslav59

  1. I loved VTek and was always a big fan (and defender at times). I'm not sure we win in 2004 or 2007 without him.
  2. I have a David Ortiz jersey, a bunch of T-shirts (only one with a name on the back- "Beckett") I have a Wally plush toy and a Sox beer mug. I have a WS baseball from SI. I have lots of Sox books. I have a tin pennant thingy but it doesn't have the 2018 update. I have a couple caps. I have a nice collar shirt just like the one Papi wore after winning the 2013 ring. It's getting worn out.
  3. The M's do hold the record for most wins in a season (216 in 2001), but no ring- no glory.
  4. How much money will they end up saving? This looks like another example of the one of the biggest contracts in history being a flop.
  5. Which might mean we didn't have what it took to get him, or we felt like he wasn't as good as the return might have been.
  6. Could be. We may never know if or if he didn't ever make a call.
  7. I know. If the reason to make the deal is to dump money, why pay most of it?
  8. MLBT reports... Craig Kimbrel Reportedly Seeking Six-Year Contract By Steve Adams | November 30, 2018 at 11:51am CDT Teams that have spoken to Craig Kimbrel’s camp early in the offseason have been told that the right-hander “is looking for a six-year deal,” tweets ESPN’s Buster Olney. It’s likely that there’s some degree of tactical negotiating at play here; free agents will always set out seeking a sum larger than the one they perhaps hope to find, and a six-year pact for Kimbrel would be precedent-setting.
  9. Colome is off the market. The Mariners announced Friday that they’ve traded reliever Alex Colome to the White Sox in exchange for catcher Omar Narvaez. I guess they liked him more than Swihart (assuming we offered him). I wonder if they'd have taken Swihart plus Johnson or Hembree (or maybe Chavis).
  10. The Mariners announced Friday that they’ve traded reliever Alex Colome to the White Sox in exchange for catcher Omar Narvaez.
  11. We didn't count on Brasier at the start of the year, but he did well. It's hard to plan on "getting lucky" again, but you are right- sign more guys like Brasier and you have a better chance one turns into Brasier. As for the 125 IP'd (less than 1/5th of our total RP IP, but most were very important ones) needing to be replaced, we could possibly, barring injuries to any pen arm, get more from these guys. Relief IP in 2018 62 Barnes same 60 Hembree same 55 Velazquez same, maybe more if no starts 41 Workman maybe +10-20 39 Johnson same, maybe more if no starts 34 Brasier should be +25-30 30 Wright who knows? 24 Thornburg maybe +25-30 22 Poyner maybe +25-40 15 Walden who knows? 7 Scott who knows? Gone 65.2 Kimbrel 62.1 Kelly 22.2 Pom 15.0 Cuevas 14.1 Smith 7.2 Haley 2.1 Beeks
  12. I think he is planning to improve his pen (luck) by obtaining 2 pitchers.
  13. It's been horrible since day one- insurance or not.
  14. I'm glad he's still in the system. I thought he showed promise before the injury.
  15. Yes. I think we need at least one very good RP'er or two solid RP'ers. This might be more accurate: ________ Barnes Brasier _______ Hembree Workman Thornburg Johnson/Vezaquez/Wright Poyner Scott Walden Brewer Lakins Josh Taylor Shawaryn/Shepherd/Josh Smith Feltman
  16. I thought we cut him.
  17. Possible pen current depth chart: Barnes Brasier Hembree Workman Thornburg Johnson/Vezaquez/Wright Poyner Scott Walden Brewer Lakins Josh Taylor Shawaryn/Shepherd/Josh Smith Feltman
  18. He may never get near to what he was that year with Milwaukee. It is a difficult injury to fully recover from, but if he does, we have a closer or a great set-up guy. I think we should plan on getting nothing from him, and anything he gives us will be a bonus.
  19. Well, the injury hurt his cause, but he was a much prospect. (of course, Pom > Reed, too.)
  20. Good points, but I'd expect some disgruntled player might speak out- not the agent admitting he failed to discuss higher taxes on one contract option vs another, just so he could make higher commissions. I think, in general, players are very happy with the services Boras offers them, and that's one reason so many go to him for representation. They want the most money they can get, and he's one of the best at getting that.
  21. It certainly would have been harder. I think the Reed trade was a good one. I doubt Bautista amounts to anything.
  22. Makes you start to wonder who you (or we) can trade to the Mets for something valuable.
  23. I really want Eovaldi the most but not for more than 2 years, so it's a tough call for me. I'm just not sure I want Eovaldi over Porcello and Sale, and if we sign him to 4 years, we'll probably have to say good bye to Rick or Chris (or Bogey or Betts). Maybe a hefty buy out option on a 3rd and 4th season might get Eovaldi to agree to a 2 year deal with the Sox. Trading for a more cost controlled closer makes a lot of sense, and I'm fine with trading Chavis and Johnson (and Swihart) to get a good one.
  24. This could be the worst trade since the Dodgers traded for AGon, CC & Beckett.
  25. Thanks. Yes, this is the article I read about conflicts of interest with agents representing multiple players.
×
×
  • Create New...