It’s called giving an opinion and providing evidence and reasoning to support it. It does not mean we don’t understand or accept others positions or that we are trying to change their opinions.
For someone who chides us for never letting go or accepting that we agree to disagree, you go on and on, just like we do. You continually bring up past opinions you think were wrong, correct?
What’s the difference?
Maybe, we should outbid everyone for ERod. The team won a ton when he started!
He even got the Tigers to go 14-12, in his starts, this year.
They went 64-72 in his non start games.
Looking at the team record in a pitcher’s starts and comparing it to the team record in non starts has more value than a pitcher’s W-L record. The way they decide which pitcher gets the win is awful. Often enough, one of the worst pitchers in the game gets the win.
Being absurd is different from bothering.
I’ll answer your Q. No w-l next to Devers because w-l is a team stat, and tge 3Bman matters less than the SP in most games.
Now answer mine. Assume all other factors are even.
You are conflating team wins and loses with a pitchers record.
Nobody thinks team wins don’t matter.
This is a perfect example or your twisted reasoning and deflections.