Lengthy but helpful discussion on Paxton if only because several have chimed in. The choices are keep him to the end of this season when he becomes a free agent, or trade him o/a July 31 in return, one assumes, for prospects and the future.
To be honest, I think you can argue both sides.
For keeping him. The Sox have a real shot at the postseason because they are 6 games above .500 with Schreiber back for tonight's game and Story due back probably in early August. If he can still hit--and that does remain to be seen--Story can make a real difference because then the Sox will potentially have four good bats in the infield--Devers, Story, Turner (yes, Turner), and Casas--as well as three in the outfield (three of Yoshida, Duran, Duvall, Dugo, and Refsnyder) and at DH.
If the Sox did not already have Paxton, he would be exactly the guy they should go after o/a July 31. Why? Because they are starting pitching poor, and Paxton is a real difference-maker, exactly what is needed.
On the other hand, for somewhat similar reasons, there are bound to be other teams who are just as desperate for a good starter for the last two months of the season. So the question is, what are they willing to give up in the way of prospects? Bloom would be dumb not to at least listen to any offers being made.
But in the end I agree with those who say to keep Paxton. I don't see a World Series this year, but I do see a wild card--and, after that, who knows?
Moonslav has already argued Bloom should go after two decent starters so that the Sox rotation would include them plus Paxton, Bello, and Sale. Then the bullpen would be outrageously deep with four long relievers (Whitlock, Houck, Pivetta, and Crawford) and four good short men (Jansen, Martin, Winck, and Bernardi).
I don't think Bloom will get those two starters, but the point is made. The one real risk I can see to keeping Paxton is that he gets injured and/or Story can't hit (or gets re-injured), etc. But where is there a MLB team that doesn't incur the same risks?