Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

rjortiz

Verified Member
  • Posts

    2,204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by rjortiz

  1. Sorry, I meant Angels not A's. I have them for 90 plus wins, with the Rangers at 88. I have the Yankees and Rays in the 84-88 wins area. I have the Red Sox slightly below at 83.
  2. I would argue that come June, the Red Sox would be better off with Ellsbury in LF, and Bradley in CF with Gomes as a bench bat. That defense would save a lot of runs, probably more than Gomes can produce with his bat.
  3. I have the Jays, Rangers, and Tigers as better teams than the Red Sox, with the Yankees, Rays, and A's as only marginally better. If things break right, I could see the Red Sox grabbing a wild card spot.
  4. The Red Sox win 83 games and finish 4th. They win 76 games if they are sellers at the deadline.
  5. How are they ranked ahead of the Jays and Nationals?"
  6. Tried clicking on the link, but I can't access it. I will try when I get back to the US on Friday.
  7. Don't forget about fearsome slugger Mark Hamilton. You are way too optimistic about every player.
  8. There's no point in letting Ellsbury walk for nothing if they are a .500 team at the deadline.
  9. It's even more pathetic when you consider that Ellsbury is a free agent after this year.
  10. When we trade Ellsbury in July, we'll see Bradley Jr. make an appearance.
  11. I'd like to join if possible.
  12. If this happens, the Red Sox will win the division.
  13. Really? Adding a 10 WAR player would increase the likeliness of missing the playoffs?
  14. I'd give up all three for Trout.
  15. Trout would make the team considerably better, regardless if they did anything with the pitching.
  16. Hard to argue with this logic, even if it means you'd reject a trade for a 10 WAR player because he isn't a pitcher. All of the pitchers you just listed are going to require contracts of that size to retain them.
  17. Harper, Trout, Stanton, Profar, Bundy, Tavares, Hernandez,............
  18. It also would erase a lot of his value. He's not moving to 1B. They'll trade him before he goes there.
  19. I think the likely scenario is Middlebrooks gets traded when Bogaerts is moved off short. He'll have more value as a trade chip then he would as a low .800 OPS first baseman.
  20. Exactly! I'm tired of people using this defense for s*** moves. The amount given up doesn't change the risk involved.
  21. We didn't give up anything of value for Carp.
  22. Can't wait until he's up with Drake Britton, then we'll definitely be World Series favorites.
  23. They aren't bad contracts for those two players. They can continue to rebuild with two more building blocks under team control.
  24. He doesn't really hit that well, and he plays the field like Gomes. I'd pass.
  25. He's probably a better brain surgeon, than a pitcher.
×
×
  • Create New...