Well I thought even at the start of the season the hole was at the 1. We did not in my view have a legitimate 1. Lester was not going to be a 1, Beckett was not and Buch was not. My God some of us were posting in December that we had two 2's and a 3 at best. This reliance on career numbers simply does not wash. What are you guys going to do when a guy has bad season after bad season, just stubbornly insist that he will eventually come back to his career numbers?
Players change over time...especially pitchers.
Back to start of the season....I gave up on us getting what we needed because I did not see it happening and began to support bringing in somebody to slot in at about where Buch was....something like a 3. I would have been wrong! I think unfortunately, we were doomed from the start which is something many of us were saying at the time....that a) we did not have a legitimate 1 and without at least resolving that issue in the rotation we were doomed...never mind the hitting...never mind the lineup that lead the division until imploding....we were doomed. Unfortunately when all is said and done, I think that will be the enduring legacy of the 2012 team. Maybe not but that is my gut now, was my gut then and have not seen anything that changes that view YET.