Exactly.
IMO if this team at least goes to the ALCS, Theo can continue but still, questions will have to be answered, and his permanence to 2013 will depend on his performance of 2012 season.
On the other hand, if this team make the WS (notice that I didn't say win it, some around here have made me softer ), I would give him 3 more years, and E1 could go in peace. :harhar:
No, we don't. As I said, we are putting 3 years on the table. The last three 3 years. Enough scope to me in order to make a considerable move in our foundations (GM/Coaches/players/farm,etc.). It doesn't matter how you split the W/L columns through time -- months/weeks/days --. The only thing that matters in order to rate his job will be the overall result through 3 years. We aren't considering isolated events in order to rate his job. It is not September 2011, It is not April 2011, It is not go out early in 2009 and It is not even make the playoffs in 2011 or 2010. What we are considering in order to rate his management, is a range of THREE FULL YEARS. Reason why we have to wait how this 2011 season ends in order to deliberate.
That being said... One the other hand and regarding to your question, as I said, make the POs is a must to this team. It is not an achievement and it shouldn't be taken as a goal. This is not TB or KC baseball. You take the POs for granted since day 1 as an organization's milestone -- among a lot other during the season --.
When do you start talking about an achievement? When you make at least the ALCS and IMO you can rate that achievement like this:
LOSE ALCS Average
WIN ALCS Good
WIN WS Excellent
Just for the record. I wish/hope/desire that Theo continues 3 more years or at least 1 year which would mean that we made this year the WS/ALCS. But again, the things are not deserved but earned.