Yes.
Besides, intentionally hitting baseball players is within the rules as well. So if you're going to cite the rules in your support of bunting during a no hitter, then you'd also have to cite the rules to support hitting batters.
And breaking up a no hitter/perfect game may not be forbidden within the de jure rules, but it is not within the de facto rules. That's what you haven't been understanding this entire thread. It's a f***** unwritten rule. Meaning that bunting to break up a no hitter/perfect game is NOT within the f***** rules of the game. It's just an unwritten rule that forbids it.
Intentionally hitting a batter in the head may be worse than bunting to break up the no hitter, but it's still within the rules, so by your logic, you'd have to support it or else you'd be hypocritical in addition to being incorrect. Besides, if you don't want to be intentionally hit in the head, then simply don't cheat and try and get on base cheaply by bunting during a no hitter/perfect game.
And guess what. If you're too busy being injured and being a little b**** by suing me for punishing you for breaking an unwritten rule, then you wouldn't be playing again and you wouldn't be able to bunt again to break up a no hitter/perfect game. In other words, it effectively kept you from doing it again. Good enough for me.