Jacoby_Ellsbury
-
Posts
12,063 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Boston Red Sox Videos
2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking
Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
Guides & Resources
2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker
News
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Jacoby_Ellsbury
-
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/01/17/peppers.panthers.ap/index.html Ugh. He's a Cowboy.
-
I like Raheem more than Spagnuolo. Raheem's popular with the players and knows the system. ORS: Spag's 4-3 =/= the Tampa 2 scheme.
-
as did I
-
My only problem is, who do we replace Gruden with? I don't think this is a situation where 'anyone but him' is a wise train of thought. Bruce Allen is a f***tard. He definitely had to go.
-
But you're contributing to the discussion nao.
-
Mark Teixeira signing and the fallout in RSN
Jacoby_Ellsbury replied to jacksonianmarch's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w226/emorock09/rage.jpg -
I'm aware of this.
-
WHO NEEDS PITCHING WHEN U HAVE A BETTER BATTING ORDER
-
Sox and Youk agree to four year, $40 mil deal
Jacoby_Ellsbury replied to Jacoby_Ellsbury's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
According to Gammons its agreed upon. -
Sox and Youk agree to four year, $40 mil deal
Jacoby_Ellsbury replied to Jacoby_Ellsbury's topic in Boston Red Sox Talk
And I could not give a f***. -
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3835955 Happy happy joy joy.
-
Like a fiddle
-
Holy shat its Kilo.
-
Doesn't mean that he doesn't believe in these guys and will just quit on them.
-
I doubt that's the case.
-
I don't think we're allowed image sigs.
-
-
Yes. You regurgitated everything I wrote so you could look smarter. http://thehealthblogger.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/cookie.jpg
-
You said: You originally said and, not or.
-
Hai
-
A complete waste of time and effort. Oh my god... really? No team is going to trade anything of value for players with injury problems, on the hope that they might bounce back and be a reliable bat in the lineup. Even if they believed it would happen... they wouldn't say so in trade discussions, they would take the 'we'll take this injury riddled player off your hands, but you can't have any good prospects for them' approach. Taking that kind of a risk (offering a good prospect/piece) on players like Ortiz and Lowell is just stupid. Now, I believe the two will contribute to the offense next year. A big chunk of GMs in baseball probably do too. But they won't express that belief. They'll try to acquire that potential comeback player of the year for next to nothing. Make sense? Its pretty basic principles of the trade market and bargaining.
-
-
Oh cool. So how do we rectify that problem? Of course, we toss more money on the payroll for a defensively challenged hacker, then attempt to trade Lowell when his market would consist of the Giants and Angels, both of whom would be offering AA prospects who likely won't amount to anything. Oh, and we'd also have to eat at least half his salary to get them to consider it, so there is more wasted money right there. Throwin' money at the problem. Ca-ching, bitch.
-
No, I don't follow. Its a retarded article, there is absolutely no need to sign Dunn or trade Lowell. You are not going to get a proven catcher for Ortiz. Not at this point. Teams aren't going to look at his 2005 and 2006 seasons during trade talks, they're going to look at last season. Its the sad truth. 2008 crippled his trade value for this winter.
-
Why do we need to trade Lowell?
