Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Jacoby_Ellsbury

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,063
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Jacoby_Ellsbury

  1. numbers don't lie
  2. More sarcasm FAILs. Terrific.
  3. Okay then how's this: We haven't even seen Wilkerson yet and season doesn't start for another month and a half, so Kilo trying to speculate how Wilkerson will do is pure baloney and shouldn't be discussed. We only discuss facts here. Better?
  4. Then what is it? No one's testified anything. Bring them into court, put their hand on a bible, make them testify under oath. Until you do that, its just he said she said now matter how reliable the information/source may be. I don't give a s*** about this argument. I've already said that I do believe that Sosa and McGwire did steroids. All I'm showing you is that your constant conjecture remarks on a Red Sox message board are f***ing stupid, when a shitload of the stuff we discuss is what-ifs/rumors/possibilities, and you yourself believe something that has no cold hard proof.
  5. When its something other than word of mouth.
  6. Yup I wish I had a loftier purpose for doing this, but...
  7. We're going around in circles with no end in sight. Keep in mind, I don't actually think McGwire and Sosa are innocent. The only reason I brought it up was in response to a700's constant 'You don't know that!', 'That's conjecture!', 'No proof!' comments, when he himself is arguing about something that he can only make assumptions about, and doesn't have proof. I've already made my point, so I'm done in here. kthxbai
  8. I'm tying it into the steroids scandal, not A-Rod. Show me the convictions and show me the undeniable proof. The whole point of me doing this was to show how a700 quickly dismisses my view as 'conjecture', but then he believes in something that is no actual, solid proof of. We can make assumptions based on Capitol Hill and all that s***.
  9. Your opinion means the world to me. 000000OOOOOOOOO000OOOOO!!!!
  10. Where's the convictions, where's the proof? It doesn't really matter, I've accomplished all I wanted to accomplish in this discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...