Dojji, a wise man (okay, it was Schilling) once said that the team who gets the most IP out of their starters will win the most games. The sox have the potential to be absolutely nasty. I think their 1-3, assuming they are healthy, could headline a rotation anywhere else. BUT, and this is a serious BUT, I think you have to look at this like a prospect. Ceiling and likelihood. I am pretty sure of what I am gonna get out of the yankees top 4 in the rotation. 190+IP from all 4, one ERA in the 3.2 range, the rest right around or above 4, and 200+ K's for 3 of them. They will all take the bump barring some catastrophic (read- UCL tear or freak injury) occurrence. For the sox, I am pretty sure that Lester will be a durable horse since he's done it two yrs running and has showed improvement rather than regression. The big question marks come after him. If Beckett is healthy for the entire yr, watch out. But he hasnt been that way since 2007. Lackey the same. DiceK is already injured. Wakefield is always hurt nowadays as well. So, if Lester, Beckett, and Lackey are all healthy and DiceK returns from his injury with the capability that he has shown glimpses of in the past, then I agree, the sox rotation is better. But, I think the likelihood that the sox stay healthy is small, which is why I'd have to call it a push/slight edge for NY.