TheKilo

That's Selig's decision. Mitchell had no power to do so.

No, because the taxation rate on levels of income isn't the same across the board. So thanks for playing.

No. Their lineup sucks.

What would the reaction have been re: Favre and Manning? Please, enlighten me. Really? It seems to me he's been raked over the coals. Bonds has had a book writeen about his steroid use. Clemens has 10+ pages. And you feel the treatment of Bonds has been incorrect? Really? What are you trying to prove here? Both players didn't have to use steroids, and did. Both were stupid for doing so. Both will be tried in the court of public opinion because of steroids. One won't be favored over another. What are you trying to prove here? There's much more evidence against Bonds. There's been rumblings of steroids against Clemens for a while now. There's been evidence against Bonds for years. Clemens for a week. What is your point here? Show me where Clemens has gotten a free pass from the fanbase, especially when you link to a story saying he's the least liked baseball player in the league? We should question the legitimacy of his records, but to say we have as much evidence against him as we do Bonds is irresponsible, almost as irresponsible as playing the race card.

Since when has the Mitchell Report been about charging people with anything?

It's looking more and more like my run is going to end...unless Romo gets his s*** together in the 4th quarter. I blame Jessica Simpson.

If you told me I'd be -9 with Romo at -3 I would have laughed at you.

Would it kill Romo to complete a f***ing pass?

Didn't you get the memo? Teams bend over for teams not names the Pats.

Rich Rodriguez to Michigan

I don't see evidence of steroids.

Tennessee's defense is killing me. Why did I not start Minnesota's??

Good news/bad news type scenario...Holt scores for STL to tie the game against my Packers...but I have Holt.

I don't think Grant fumbled that ball, either.

Ryan Grant scores me a TD early in the 1st quarter.

What the f***? What have I said that isn't logical?

Why not post this in your other thread???

You acknowledge it's a longshot and yet still argue in favor of this position. Kudos, sir.

How does the Kool-Aid taste?

Edmonds is 10x what Crisp is? Crisp 2007 - .268/.330/.382/.712 Edmonds 2007 - .252/.325/.403/.728 And which had the historically good defensive season? And one cost twice as much. BTW, you claiming someone out for being argumentative is awesome due to your inability to conduct intelligent discourse with members on this board.