So when I try to use +/- in favor of a defenseman, you come back saying it's irrelevant due to the fact that offensive superstars typically have a low +/- because it's more tied to defensemen.
I posit that Wideman's +/-, as a defenseman, is one of the main reasons he's having a more successful season than Boyes, and you come back with the argument that the only reason Wideman's +/- is any good is that the offense is improved.
I'm curious as to what statistic you believe is better suited in comparing the two defensemen, which is really what the whole argument is about. I also find the sample to be significant because the NHL season is now over 25% completed.
You then make the "stupid, moronic" comment that the Bruins defense is a below-average corps even though the way they have played through 21 games suggests nothing of the sort.
So I ask - why do you think Boyes is having a better season at this point than Wideman?