I haven't spoken on the merits or shortcomings of Adrian Beltre once. So I'm not sure how I could oversell his usefulness. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that might be the first time I've even written his name on this board.
I haven't brought it up. That has been on purpose. The point that is being brought up is that nobody seems to be worthy of replacing Mike Lowell to you, including moving over a gold glove, MVP vote getting 1B for another gold glove MVP vote getting, switch hitting 1B. which was an option.
Regarding the above-average swap, I could buy into that logic if one player wasn't age 34 (and that is allegedly) coming off a 113 game season (where coincidentally, he put up nearly identical stats to this year) But I do remember you saying that, and I could buy into that argument.
I'm not bludgeoning you with hindsight. I'm bludgeoning you with the FORESIGHT that most reasonable people had regarding Mike Lowell, mid-30's coming off of hip surgery.
Did I not talk about this extensively last offseason, with you right in the thick of the argument? Could you explain, then, how it is hindsight?
The only person it is hindsight for, is you. My foresight was 20/20. With Lowell AND Ortiz. 50 games out of the lineup. Definitely not a drain on team resources, whatsoever.
Personally, I'm kind of neutral on Beltre, other than the concept that we'd essentially be paying him like 17M to play third after the Lowell dump (assuming Lowell could actually play 3rd next year).