Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

a700hitter

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    70,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospect Rankings

Boston Red Sox Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Boston Red Sox Fan Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Boston Red Sox News, Rumors & Analysis

2026 Boston Red Sox Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by a700hitter

  1. Start a thread when Rolen signs with us. Otherwise, drop it. BTW, he ain't coming to Fenway.
  2. I made no assertion about the situation, so how could I be wrong? I should admit being wrong about what in this situation? Be specific.
  3. :harhar:
  4. E1 popped in ocassionally during the off season. He's been busy with wok and being a father. There really has been very little to discuss.
  5. You are wrong you stupid loser. He never asserted that there was friction between Baker and Rolen. He simply said that he didn't think Baker wanted him back. The article does give the strong impression that Baker was willing to move forward without Rolen and with Frazier. Increase your meds so you can read better.
  6. Here's the fact: Is it subject to interpretation? Sure, but the title certainly asked the right question.
  7. He never said that there was tension. He just said that he didn't want him back.
  8. No, stupid is stupid. I didn't see dishonesty on anyone's part. Opinion is opinion.
  9. Here's what he said: BTW, it was Spitball that had referenced the problems with 2 other managers. SBF, never did. Can I get a GOTCHA from my fans!! Maybe from my biggest fan, Dutchy?
  10. I don't think he said that.
  11. How would you interpret the statement below from January 8th? http://fm100thefan.com/1760/no-word-from-rolen-yet-baker-ready-to-move-on/ This is a far cry from the verbal flowers Baker threw Rolen's way after he formally announced that he would not be returning. It's not made up either.
  12. It's just a really stupid argument.
  13. I thought the thread was about whether Rolen would be a good fit for our bench, but everyone is arguing over whether Dusty Baker wanted Rolen back? WTF!! Just ridiculous. It isn't germane to the thread. It's just another stupid game of attempted gotcha. If Fred had said that Rolen hated clam chowder, the same people would be arguing over that like it was a meaningful fact. BTW, I hear that he hates the stuff, can't stand the smell and doesn't like to be within 500 yards of it.
  14. I didn't defend SBF. I said that it was a matter of opinion whether the Reds wanted Rolen back.
  15. The tournament has no point. The World's best players are not there so who cares.
  16. This from the guy who expects Cano to be a Dodger based on no evidence at all.
  17. I claimed nothing as fact, so I don't understand your response.
  18. I will be in Ft. Myers tomorrow. I am looking forward to seeing Bradley.
  19. What Marlins asked for and whether there were any firm offers is a subject for pure conjecture. It's just a guess, and probably an inaccurate guess at that. The only thing that is certain is that the Jays got the deal done and picked up big talent on both sides of the ball.
  20. He's unemployed.
  21. Or Scott Rolen.
  22. It's meaningless tournament that disrupts spring training.
×
×
  • Create New...