Actually, the Raider's game was the right call by the letter of the rule, and according to this piece, the non-call wasn't. No doot aboot it.
I'm actually very surprised the impact of the disparity of the calls isn't getting any press. I know, I know, the Pats had ample other opportunities to win the game, blah, blah, blah. Fact is, the officiating on those two calls/non-calls played a huge role in the outcome. If the roles were reversed, and the Pats were on the beneficial end, I think we'd be hearing about this until deep into the summer due to the fact that much of the media is looking for fodder against the Pats.