I liked signing VMart too, but it didn't happen.
This team seemed to have a formula to predict how many wins their team would have, with a +/- of maybe 3-4 wins on either side. Year after year they were able to make reasonable guesses about where their team stood, what an addition of Player A or Player B would mean, and they could play that out over a few years.
Sadly, they weren't concerned about whether VMart could produce, they were concerned about whether he could stay at catcher for the length of his contract and felt that they had numerous other reliable options that could do better. Right now, that type of calculation seems really petty and high-minded. At the time, it seemed like the type of ultra-fine refining that this FO was capable to do because they had team-construction down to a science.
Currently, it is like there is an infection on this team. Or, it is like other teams have this team's "playbook" and have figured out how to pitch to Ellsbury, Crawford, Ortiz, Drew, and Youkilis like a football defense that knows what offensive play is coming.
When this type of thing happens in the middle of the season we don't worry. Usually we have seen a few wins and believe that the team is better than they look on their worst day. Inexplicably, in this case, we haven't seen this team even win consecutive days, let alone have any decent winning-streak. They COULD be as bad as they look, because we don't know better.
Statistics say they will ascend to the mean, but they might also just suck and throw every metric and previous way of thinking about teams into disarray.
It totally sucks, but if it turns out that this team does NOT get better, then it will have been because of as-of-yet unknown reasons, not because the team didn't use the best available information to construct their team.