...but there's no basis to your conjecture. I have said this time and time again, yet it doesn't seem to stick. There is basis for conjecture of Sosa and McGwire BECAUSE OF THE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST THEM. There is NONE for Ortiz, so it makes no sense to conjecture about him until someone actually comes forward and says something about it. I wouldn't be surprised if Ortiz is also in the middle of this, but as of right now, there is NO REASON to talk about Ortiz.
700 has only mentioned Sosa and McGwire because there are already accusations against them. What exactly does he believe? All I've been reading is him giving his input on the possibility of them having used. It makes sense to talk about it, since other people have accused them. Solid proof is not necessary for such a discussion. Neither is it needed for a discussion about Ortiz, but what IS needed for a discussion about Ortiz is a BASIS for the discussion. There isn't any.