I'd rather have someone better, too, and this isn't about DHern vs Johnson. There will be room for both and 2-3 scrubs worse than them. Our pitching depth sucks.
It is going to be extremely difficult to fill out the 2020 roster with decent players from the 20-40 slots.
We used 26 pitchers this year. Johnson is a hell of a lot better than many of those 26.
Look, I don't think we reset next year. I think we should, but I'm pretty sure we won't. That being said, if you guys think Henry is going to okay a massive spending winter to replace guys like Johnson, Velazquez, Hembree, Brewer, and others, I think a rude awakening awaits you.
I'm no Johnson fan. I've suggested trading him dozens of time. I agree he has no serious upside, but he has shown he can do okay as a starter. He has a 4.04 ERA as a starter over the past 2 seasons. That's not someone you just DFA., especially when we have a rotation that looked so horrible this season.
I have more faith in DHern, but he is a huge question mark. He has way more upside than Johnson, but Johnson's floor is higher, and there's plenty of room for both on the 2020 roster.
Assuming Porcello does not return, and we use 20+ pitchers next year, can you name 20 guys who are more likely to do better than Johnson next year? (If you do, what about 25 pitchers- the amount we used this year, not counting Nunez.)
9 Clearly better than Johnson:
Sale, Price, ERod, Eovaldi
Workman, Barnes, Walden, Hembree, Taylor
5 Maybe better:
Brewer, Wright, Lakins, Brasier, DHern
6 Maybe worse:
Weber, Velazquez, Shawaryn, DReyes, THouck, Feltman
5 Clearly worse:
JSmith, Poyner, ERamirez, TKelley, KHart
Even if you think all the pitchers in the "maybe worse" list are better than Johnson, we would likely need 21 pitchers, and Johnson would be #21.
You don't DFA guys like Johnson, unless and until we know we have better choices. I doubt we sign 5 pitchers this winter that are better than Johnson.