moonslav59

Cora is about the farthest reason for our losing as can be. I'd argue we'd have more losses with almost anyone else.

I've often said I'm not sure how well DD would have done, if handed the exact circumstances Bloom was handed, but I'm pretty sure Bloom would not have matched DD's record, if he was handed the circumstances DD was back in 2016. I feel very confident, we'd have done significantly worse. DD is a damn good GM, when allowed to spend and trade.

Rigamortis set in.

Near total eclipse in Houston, now.

I have never said anything close to that, so stop. Saying we may never know everything is the truth. If you imply that means he is certainly guilty of something, that's on you, not me. Is it beyond reason to think he did something very wrong, and the woman used a poor choice of words to text someone saying she's going to "blackmail him?" Look, I have no idea what really happened, and neither do you. This speculation based on tidbits of information is not something I like to do. None of us know s***. We read one piece of evidence, and now pretend to know everything? Yes, that piece of evidence looks very damning against the woman, and likely was why she dropped the charges. I think he dropped charges, too.

My point is we will likely never know the full story. To think that just because the woman used the words "blackmail" in a text means he did nothing wrong, is just not a certainty.

They played great, all year on almost no rest. Then, they get a few days off and sucked.

Plus, despite how many posters here do not like Cora or do not want him back, I think almost every GM or GM to be respects his abilities. It's not like we're forcing the next GM to keep Bobby V.

That's not what I meant, but yes, if we suck, Cora is more likely to be fire (or promoted) than a 1 year GM. I did not word that well. If we lose next year with a big budget, the GM will be blamed by fans, the media and posters, here more than Cora. That is what I meant. Yes, it would be easier to fire or promote Cora than ax a new GM after one season. If we think it's hard finding our 5th GM, imagine looking again, next year. Agreed, that aint happening.

Thanks.

To fans of the underdog teams, they love crapshootery. At least we've proven once and for all, more days off hurt a team. (Are you listening, Cora?)

If we lose, some will certainly blame Cora, but the GM will bear the brunt, again and again. We are seeing more talk about JH, Kennedy & Co, but the players the next GM brings in will be why we win or lose. No, if the budget is slashed, then it might be different, although it wasn't for Bloom. Maybe it will be different, next time.

I have never disagreed with this. He deserved to be fired. He bumbled his biggest deals, too many times and failed to find the "gems in the rough" like the Rays seem to do. He was the fall guy for many reasons, including his own wrong-doings. He did not slash then set the budget. I do not think it was his choice to not trade any top prospects, when it might have saved his job had he cleaned the farm of them,

I get that, but to say the GM is never the fall guy because he's not fully in charge is just wrong. You look up "Fall guy professions" in the dictionary, and it lists GMs first. There are various degrees of "being in charge," too. I think Theo was way more in charge, after the gorilla suit event than anyone afterwards. I think DD was given more control until about after the 2018 deadline. IMO, since JH bought the team, no GM had... 1. Such restricted winter spending budget, especially before 2020, but before 2021 and 2022 were pretty restrictive, too. (The pre-2023 budget was large, but there was a lot of good players and big contracts needing to be replaced in kind- at inflationary prices.) Look at the biggest FA and extension Sox contracts over the last 20 years, adjust for inflation and see where the Story and Yoshida signings fit in. Bloom never got to see a day of the Devers contract. Ben was about the same with Pablo and HRam. Apples to oranges. 2. Some GM did seem to have restrictions on trading top prospects for part of their tenure. Ben seemed to have that for mush of his tenure. Bloom had it for his whole term as GM. I know some think that was Ben's and Bloom's choices, but I think it was an organizational decision. The sheer number of decently ranked prospects DD traded was more than Bloom + Ben + the last few years of the Theo regime. It is nothing short of apples to oranges, when comparing the parameters placed on certain Sox GMs over the last 20 years. 3. The "don't sign a pitcher over 30 to a long term deal" was not something every GM was allowed to do. Only 1. 4. Huge multi top prospect deals for a stud or two only happened under two GMs, and they happened more than once. Zero for Ben and Bloom. Apples to oranges. Call me a whiner. Call me an apologist, if you must, but the circumstances our 4 GMs were handed and demanded were light years apart- as were the results, granted, yet not unexpected by some.

Did you see how OJ was found not guilty?

Yes. That's not proof he did nothing wrong.

No. Bloom is obviously the fall guy, and he wasn't fully in charge.

It's always going to be a blame game. The GM is always the fall guy, so this actually gives him one out.

What capable GM would want to fire Cora? If they wanted to, who wants them? It's that simple.

BINGO! True dat!

Lot's of hot air coming from the Yankee and Sox talking heads.

I drew my conclusion. The Astros are kings and cheaters. The rest of the AL West has sucked or been meh. The AL East has had just about every team be very good to great, at various moments in the past 14, 17 or 20+ years.

How will anyone ever know, for sure, if the allegations were wrong or not, partially wrong or not, or total BS?

I guess I just see it like JH decided to cut spending. I doubt he'd have decided to spend more, because DD was begging him for more money. I'm also not sure DD would want to be part of a situation where he had to beg, but who knows. They might have lied to him, too. They might have said, hang in there: we will spend way more, soon. Then, not done it. I have no idea what GM woulda/coulda done better or worse than Bloom did, under the exact same circumstances. Adding a variable about possible different budgets and mandates makes it too complex for me to ponder, and besides, what would be the point. It would be apples to oranges. Maybe DD would have built better 26 man rosters, but the farm and foundation would be worse off. Maybe, he'd have spent the same AAV, but we'd have more longer term deals (good or bad.) Who knows? I know Bloom blew his chance. He botched the big moves and the non moves were even worse. IMO, he did a good job on building up the farm and the 40 man roster depth. I think after the rule 5 players are added, this fall, the 40 man will be as strong as it has been since 2019 or before. I think that was the major task given to him. That grade is still pending, and it is total speculation on what the results will be, but I'm not sure other GMs woulda/coulda done much better, on that front. (For what it's worth.)

WRONG! One out of 5 teams does not make a division superior.