Hitters don't hit every mistake pitch a pitcher throws. If they did, the final score would have been 122 to something last night. But you cannot look at Masterson's location last night and say that he offered up much of a test or a challenge as a starting pitcher. He just didn't.
I enjoyed it...but I took for what it was as opposed to taking it for what it was not. It's nice that we made Masterson pay for most of his mistakes. There are actually teams of players out there that would not have done as well in spite of Masterson's vulnerability last night. Those teams are going to find their way to the basement of their respective divisions cause if you can't take advantage of a guy throwing the way Masterson was throwing last night, pack it in cause you are all done. Even if you can pitch some you are all done.
The other thing that is being undervalued is the comfort zone you get hitting with a lead. Why we would miss this one is also beyond me. We got a healthy dose of how much more difficult things get for hitters when you are constantly playing from behind. Well the opposite is just as true when you are always playing from in front. That is why the Ells/Vic combination has been at least from the everyday player perspective and particularly Vic, so much a factor in the team's early success.
The two most critical guys for the Sox so far have been Lester and Buch, without question. But I would stick two everyday players into the mix of three through six when trying to value contributions to this early success. Third through sixth for me would be Vic for the way he has set the early table and for the way he has played in the field. Uehara for the way he has come in and shut down mid/late inning efforts by the opponent, Bailey for the way he has closed and Ells for the same kinds of contributions that Vic has made but somewhat less effectively. I might be tempted to insert Taz where I have Bailey cause it is not like Bailey is coming into too many tense situations closing so far.
Vic and Ells have pressured the opposition almost from jump street in every game and have allowed the Sox to jump out to early leads. In fact they have jumped so far out early that they are taking opponents out of their game plans before they can even implement them.
As I stated in a different post and thread, the Ells/Vic combination have been about as effective as Jeter/Ich was for the Yanks, except Ells and Vic are about 50 years younger. In fact that is also in part why if I had my druthers, I would switch Ells with Vic. Both are fast enough to lead off. Vic is really trying to copy the way Jeter now hits whether Vic knows it or not. That is why I would switch him with Ells. As long as Ells remains healthy his power numbers will be better than Vics. The only dif would be that Ich may have better bat control than Ells has and you might be more effective in the hit and run with Vic remaining in the 2 spot. However the 2011 version of Jeter was not faster than the other three guys in the discussion. Vic is faster as is Ells. Ells slugging % is better than Vics so far but Vics OBP is better than Ells. No surprises in either case.
Things are going too good to mess with those two guys at the top at this point. Regardless of what I would like to see, even I would not likely have the guts to switch Ells with Vic at this very moment.