As usual total numbers can be deceiving. Just like the total runs tally is deceiving. The Sox do score a lotta' runs but they do not score them in the traditional wall banging fashion of the Tigers and it does not prevent them from being dominated by certain kinds of pitchers, particularly pitchers the rely on their breaking pitches. The fact that the Sox can hit a breaking ball does not mean much since there are pitchers out there that throw pretty mediocre breaking balls. I am more concerned with the games where they are dominated by pitchers with good breaking balls or games where they are dominated generally. So looking at the shut outs:
Johnson April 5th…threw more curves and sliders than FB's and Change ups combined and threw them for a high strike rate, especially curves. Does not even have much of a FB any longer and his change is not a pitch he relies on. Still has a decent Sinker but is no longer a power pitcher.
Colon April 23… threw more sinkers than any other pitch. This was a dominating performance from a power pitcher as I consider a pitching performance that included that many Sinkers thrown for strikes to be a power pitching exhibition.
Holland May 3…Holland is not the same kind of power pitcher as Colon or Moore but I still consider this a traditional power pitcher showing. Threw mostly FB's and Sinkers with the Change his most important other pitch. That is now one of the hallmarks of starters that are power pitchers. The change is an important pitch for the power pitcher.
Tillman June 14….Fairly even mix of pitches, threw 20 Curve balls only half for strikes. Does not have an overpowering FB and does not depend on his Change up
Weaver July 7….. Another guy like Fitzer, no longer really even has a FB worth talking about
Moore July 22…traditional power pitcher's game was overpowering and again as is the case with the other two power pitchers in this grouping, depends on a good Change
Tillman July 26….Fairly even mix of pitches again did not have overpowering stuff and threw 22 Curves with a much higher strike count than July 14. Again did not rely on a Change for anything
Oberholtzer, Aug 5….Fairly even mix of pitches…threw more Curves than any other pitch than the FB, threw half of them for strikes and again does not posses an overpowering FB nor depend on his Change.
Nolasco, Aug 23….29 sliders, 14 curves, 32 FB's again not overpowering. Threw the breaking balls for a higher strike count than any other pitch. Does not depend on a Change for anything
Fitzer today, don't have the count as yet but Fitzer threw a ton of Curves for strikes in many cases leaving the Sox with their bats on their shoulders.
I am only concerned here with the kinds of pitching exhibitions that stop the Sox in their tracks. Looking at this year's shut outs, there is a far higher number generated from breaking ball pitchers that neither have overpowering stuff nor rely on a Change for anything than there are from power pitchers with good FB's or Sinkers relying on a Change as their most important secondary pitch.
The only three shut out games thrown by power pitchers were the Holland, Moore and Colon games. Colon threw far more Sinkers than FB's but I consider the Sinker a power pitchers pitch especially when thrown with the strike consistency that Colon had. So his game goes into the power pitcher category as does Moores. Moore's shutout was truly a power pitching exhibition and he was overpowering. You could almost argue Holland either way but I am comfortable putting his game in the power pitcher's category
The rest are a collection of breaking ball/curve masters, some with hardly a FB that they can throw for a strike without being hurt. All of them threw curves and sliders for high strike counts and none relied on a Change for anything. That makes seven shut outs from curve/slider breaking ball masters all throwing them for high strike counts and only three from traditional power pitchers depending on a Change as an important secondary pitch.