Lowe has settled in and has been much better tonight.
I do agree that this shift s*** has gotten entirely out of control both Rays and Sox.
In the first place, IMO you really have to have a preponderance of evidence to be compelled to move away from optimal field coverage generally and the ability of the pitcher to pitch the best way for him to pitch and move to an overloaded positioning of players which forces the pitcher to pitch to the shift.
If a hitter is so prone to hitting the ball to a certain field and he is so dangerous as a hitter that the shift is the ONLY way to counter him, then that is the only situation where I would feel like the shift is justified and there better be a career worth of evidence pointing that way. Anything less is not better than a hunch.
In the first place in many cases, who is to say that the regular fielder would not make the play on the ball anyway. Yet the Manager ends up getting to look like some genius because the shifted fielder made the play. At the end of the day the number of times you might actually handcuff your pitcher can't even be calculated. In fact that is a second criteria that I would demand in order to be satisfied that we should shift. So the first criteria for me is that we are talking about a dangerous hitter, somebody that can really hurt me. Then, I would want a preponderance of career evidence that the hitter hits to a particular field a very high percentage of the time and I would want the shift in every case to play to the strengths of my pitcher and not force him to pitch in a way that is simply out of character.
IMO once you satisfied all three of those conditions the number of times a team would shift would MAYBE end up being once or twice per game. The way it is done now is mental masturbation for Managers and Coaches.....