lol. I agree with you somewhat. I do think that, for the most part, the idea of "clutch" in baseball doesn't exist. However, I do believe there are some cases where clutch does exist. There are some people who handle pressure better than others and that's where "clutch" comes into play. There are some ball players who don't perform as well under pressure (as in bases loaded, 2 out, trailing in the game, etc). However, for the most part, I don't think that is an issue for the good/great hitters.
I believe people exaggerate the idea of "clutch". It does exist, to some point, but to the extent that a player is much better in pressure situations than normal situations. For instance, I don't believe it would be possible for a hitter like Adam Dunn to be a .300 hitter with RISP while a .240 hitter overall. I do, though, believe it is possible for someone to be a .275 hitter overall but struggle in pressure situations, but again, we aren't talking about great players. Adam Dunn I would consider a good, solid player. I certainly wouldn't call him one of the top, elite, hitters, though, so I don't expect him to be clutch. I really just think people misuse the word clutch. Great hitters are great because they are clutch. They handle pressure situations just as well as any other.
Now, I do believe clutch actually exists in some other sports. Statistics do back up that clutch exists in basketball and NFL Quarterbacks. For the NBA, there are many players who do in fact dial it up in the end of close games, putting up numbers that are much better than they do in the previous 43 minutes of games. King James is one of those guys. In the NFL, there are Quarterbacks who play much better in pressure situations, such as Hasselbeck and Warner. They have consistently put up better numbers late in close games, as well as big playoff games, than they do during the first 3-3/12 quarters. Then you have the guys who fall apart in pressure situations (Brett Favre).