What? "My use"??? I was responding to a poster on here who said that he heard the possible trade was Broxton and Hall for Manny, with Hall as the main piece.
Reading comprehension, buddy. Give it a try.
I have NEVER heard that scenario used when stereotyping Californians.
And just so your stupid ass doesn't repeat the same mistake, California leads the country in anti-smoking laws.
The male group orgies are in San Francisco. Look at a map, that's over 300 miles away from here (L.A.).
And one other thing. Why would I go to a male group orgy when I am a married woman?
You sure you don't want Billingsley, Elbert, Martin, and Either while you're at it? Jesus, no wonder the Dodgers are backing away from the Manny discussions.
You guys are clueless.
Broxton is a 21-year-old beast. He'd be the main piece no question. Ever wonder why the Dodgers only gave a 1-year contract to their star closer Saito? 'Cause Broxton is locked in that spot for the next decade.
He has also publicly stated that he wants to stay with LA, will give a hometown discount, and it will be his final decision, not Boras's. I highly doubt the Red Sox will get him for an incentive-laden contract. Good luck though.
Drew wanted to play CF in LA, but the Dodgers said no because of his styrofoam knees.
But hey, if the Sox fans want him in CF, they must know more than the team that had him for the two previous years.
Okay dipshits.
Would you rather have Schmidt or Maddux?
Schmidt is on the verge of signing with the Dodgers. That will give them the following rotation:
Schmidt
Lowe
Penny
Billingsley
Wolf
Kuo
and possibly Stultz
Now, tell me where the f*** Maddux fits into that rotation? Do you understand why the Dodgers didn't spend $20 million for a 43 year old pitcher who chokes in the playoffs?
Sorry to see my dear sweet Annie go. In the meantime, please don't ban me. I am a good baseball fan, and I consistently beat Fred at baseball trivia games.