I wonder what is taking this issue so long to resolve. Then, my contrarian side came about and asked the question, maybe the sox don't want to re-sign Jon Lester? It sounds like a foolish proposition, but then I actually thought about it some more. What is the driving force for Lester to be re-signed now instead of allowing his contract to play out. Well, unequivocally, it is the fact that he was the balls in the playoffs in 2013. Well, strip away the tournament, and you have a guy who, even at a "discount" is expected to be paid for something that he isn't. Let's look at Jon Lester.
From 2008-2010, he was an unquestioned ace. 622IP with a WAR of 16.6. During that time, his average FB was a full mph higher than it is now.
From 2011-2013, he has been good, but not ace-like. 610IP 7.5WAR.
And now, we come to 2013, his so-called return to greatness year after his down 2012. Well, when you tear apart the numbers, the two seasons aren't that much different. Yes, his WAR was much higher in 2013, but it was still the second lowest of his career to 2012. Go based on his xFIP and you can see a player who was actually a little worse than 2012.
Strange indeed. Nobody is going to question the fact that Jon Lester is a front of the rotation starter, but IMO, he has been pitching like a #2 the past 3 seasons, when he was a #1 for the 3 before that. So fast forward to the contrarian argument. Lester just turned 30, meaning his first season of a new contract will be in his year 31 season. Everybody seems to use the Cliff Lee contract as a jumping point for Lester, and it has its valid points, but Lee turned 33 in the first yr of his 5 yr contract. Now, Lee had been more productive the three seasons prior to his contract yr compared to Lester has been his last 3, but consider that the cost of inflation. And if Lester gets placed under contract to a similar age, you are looking at a 7yr $175 mil deal. CC also inked a similar contract extension when he was close to opting out that would guarantee him $122 mil over 5 yrs before his age 32 season. So a market value Jon Lester deal is somewhere in the 6 yr $150 mil range. Let's say Lester wants to give the sox a discount.
Well, discounts usually are on AAV, not years. Let's say his discount is $20 mil. Would you sign Lester for 6 yrs and $130 mil? That is probably the question the sox are asking themselves right now. Is it worth it to commit to Jon Lester for years 31-36 at $22 mil a season, or have they already gotten his best years out of him and would they be better off getting a pick and bringing up a kid? It's an interesting dilemma, and one that makes me ever more curious the longer we go without Lester inking an extension