Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

Brandon Glick

Site Manager
  • Posts

    513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brandon Glick

  1. Two members of the Red Sox's projected Opening Day rotation have received unfortunate injury updates in spring training. What does it mean for Boston? View full video
  2. Two members of the Red Sox's projected Opening Day rotation have received unfortunate injury updates in spring training. What does it mean for Boston?
  3. Rumors have swirled that the Red Sox could pursue the slugging Blue Jays first baseman in free agency next year. Is that something we should feel confident in? View full video
  4. Rumors have swirled that the Red Sox could pursue the slugging Blue Jays first baseman in free agency next year. Is that something we should feel confident in?
  5. This is the kind of content you just can't get anywhere else, Red Sox fans...
  6. Bregman is a pull-hitter with power. Will his numbers improve as he takes aim at the Green Monster after so many years of punishing the Crawford Boxes?
  7. Bregman is a pull-hitter with power. Will his numbers improve as he takes aim at the Green Monster after so many years of punishing the Crawford Boxes? View full video
  8. The Red Sox's incumbent third baseman has made it clear he won't change positions, even for the reigning Gold Glove winner. Will Boston suffer in 2025 because of their star's stubbornness? View full video
  9. The Red Sox's incumbent third baseman has made it clear he won't change positions, even for the reigning Gold Glove winner. Will Boston suffer in 2025 because of their star's stubbornness?
  10. How should the Red Sox handle their infield logjam with Alex Bregman now in tow? View full video
  11. How should the Red Sox handle their infield logjam with Alex Bregman now in tow?
  12. The Red Sox are set to introduce their latest star free agent addition to the team after signing Alex Bregman to a three-year, $120 million contract. View full video
  13. The Red Sox are set to introduce their latest star free agent addition to the team after signing Alex Bregman to a three-year, $120 million contract.
  14. Rumors have been swirling around the third baseman in recent weeks, but the Red Sox haven't been mentioned all that often. Are they still in the running for Bregman? View full video
  15. Rumors have been swirling around the third baseman in recent weeks, but the Red Sox haven't been mentioned all that often. Are they still in the running for Bregman?
  16. Three players made the Hall of Fame this year. Next year's ballot isn't looking as promising. View full video
  17. Three players made the Hall of Fame this year. Next year's ballot isn't looking as promising.
  18. Alex Bregman remains available in free agency. It feels like the Red Sox should do whatever they can to change that. View full video
  19. Alex Bregman remains available in free agency. It feels like the Red Sox should do whatever they can to change that.
  20. This is a work of satire. Please enjoy. The Boston Red Sox came into this offseason with a clear mission: improve the starting rotation. Though the team finished the 2024 season tied for seventh in rotation ERA (3.81), their FIP (4.10) ranked in the middle of the pack. It was clear to any onlookers that, outside of breakout right-hander Tanner Houck, the team lacked impact talent. Well, thus far, the team has accomplished its goal, trading for Garrett Crochet and signing free agent pitchers Walker Buehler and Patrick Sandoval. With Lucas Giolito set to return from injury in 2025, the rotation is both deeper and more talented. Dig a little deeper, however, and you'll notice a common characteristic among the new arrivals: all four have undergone Tommy John surgery in the last three seasons. While that isn't that uncommon in a day and age where it seems that everyone and their mother is taking a ticket and waiting for their number to be called to get the privilege to go under the knife, it is peculiar that the Red Sox seem to be exclusively targeting starters with scarred elbows. It applies to relievers like Liam Hendriks and Justin Wilson. I caught up with chief baseball officer Craig Breslow during our monthly book club meeting — this month's book was the Merriam-Webster dictionary, chosen by Breslow himself — and asked about the reasoning behind the club's apparent predilection. He pulled me aside, saying nothing, and merely pointed at a humongous poster of famed surgeon Dr. James Andrews on his wall. Intrigued, I decided to investigate the matter further. I visited Dr. Andrews' home and was greeted at the door by Theo Epstein, architect of curse-busting teams in both Boston and Chicago. Epstein escorted me inside, and I bore witness to a poker game between Epstein, Cubs POBO Jed Hoyer, and Dr. Andrews. Tommy John, the 26-year MLB veteran, was dealing the cards. There was a fifth chair at the table, but no executive seated in it. As he played with "his boys," Andrews explained to me that the empty seat usually belonged to Breslow. Apparently, Breslow lost a rather high-stakes hand of poker in December 2020. "It was the middle of the pandemic," said Andrews, "so you have to understand that everyone was getting desperate. The Winter Meetings were canceled that year. Craig just got promoted by these two buffoons," he cackled, pointing at Hoyer and Epstein, "and he was so excited to finally get in on our little game here. I knew his reputation as a wunderkind, so I took him for a ride. He's still paying off the debt." I asked the good doctor whether it wasn't enough to be a world-renowned surgeon. Did he really have to grift the Cubs' assistant general manager too? The entire table, except for Tommy John, laughed. "I took no pleasure in resurrecting any of those careers," Andrews explained. "Fixing knees and elbows was just a job. But drawing to a full house and forcing Craig to spend his entire career signing only pitchers with a Tommy John on their chart? Now that was fun." Processing this new information, I started to ask whether Breslow's debt was officially paid, now that he'd signed half a dozen such pitchers and Andrews was retired from his "just a job." Tommy John must have sensed it coming, though, because he shook his head and escorted me out the front door before I could say another word. In other news, next month's book club assignment is Roget's Thesaurus. View full article
  21. The Boston Red Sox came into this offseason with a clear mission: improve the starting rotation. Though the team finished the 2024 season tied for seventh in rotation ERA (3.81), their FIP (4.10) ranked in the middle of the pack. It was clear to any onlookers that, outside of breakout right-hander Tanner Houck, the team lacked impact talent. Well, thus far, the team has accomplished its goal, trading for Garrett Crochet and signing free agent pitchers Walker Buehler and Patrick Sandoval. With Lucas Giolito set to return from injury in 2025, the rotation is both deeper and more talented. Dig a little deeper, however, and you'll notice a common characteristic among the new arrivals: all four have undergone Tommy John surgery in the last three seasons. While that isn't that uncommon in a day and age where it seems that everyone and their mother is taking a ticket and waiting for their number to be called to get the privilege to go under the knife, it is peculiar that the Red Sox seem to be exclusively targeting starters with scarred elbows. It applies to relievers like Liam Hendriks and Justin Wilson. I caught up with chief baseball officer Craig Breslow during our monthly book club meeting — this month's book was the Merriam-Webster dictionary, chosen by Breslow himself — and asked about the reasoning behind the club's apparent predilection. He pulled me aside, saying nothing, and merely pointed at a humongous poster of famed surgeon Dr. James Andrews on his wall. Intrigued, I decided to investigate the matter further. I visited Dr. Andrews' home and was greeted at the door by Theo Epstein, architect of curse-busting teams in both Boston and Chicago. Epstein escorted me inside, and I bore witness to a poker game between Epstein, Cubs POBO Jed Hoyer, and Dr. Andrews. Tommy John, the 26-year MLB veteran, was dealing the cards. There was a fifth chair at the table, but no executive seated in it. As he played with "his boys," Andrews explained to me that the empty seat usually belonged to Breslow. Apparently, Breslow lost a rather high-stakes hand of poker in December 2020. "It was the middle of the pandemic," said Andrews, "so you have to understand that everyone was getting desperate. The Winter Meetings were canceled that year. Craig just got promoted by these two buffoons," he cackled, pointing at Hoyer and Epstein, "and he was so excited to finally get in on our little game here. I knew his reputation as a wunderkind, so I took him for a ride. He's still paying off the debt." I asked the good doctor whether it wasn't enough to be a world-renowned surgeon. Did he really have to grift the Cubs' assistant general manager too? The entire table, except for Tommy John, laughed. "I took no pleasure in resurrecting any of those careers," Andrews explained. "Fixing knees and elbows was just a job. But drawing to a full house and forcing Craig to spend his entire career signing only pitchers with a Tommy John on their chart? Now that was fun." Processing this new information, I started to ask whether Breslow's debt was officially paid, now that he'd signed half a dozen such pitchers and Andrews was retired from his "just a job." Tommy John must have sensed it coming, though, because he shook his head and escorted me out the front door before I could say another word. In other news, next month's book club assignment is Roget's Thesaurus.
  22. The Red Sox have had a productive offseason, but have they done enough to compete in an ultra-competitive AL East in 2025? View full video
  23. The Red Sox have had a productive offseason, but have they done enough to compete in an ultra-competitive AL East in 2025?
  24. Let’s get this out of the way up front: New York and Boston haven’t had identical offseasons. The Yankees actually lost Juan Soto, whereas the Red Sox merely failed to sign him. And the Bronx Bombers have also added to their offense, acquiring Cody Bellinger in a swap with the Chicago Cubs, whereas the Red Sox have only brought in backup catcher Carlos Narváez to replace the departing Kyle Teel…in a trade with the Yankees. Besides that, though, these two longtime rivals have mirrored each other closely in how they’ve chosen to operate this winter. The Red Sox signed Aroldis Chapman (before Soto’s deal became official) and traded for Garrett Crochet, while the Yankees signed Max Fried and traded for Devin Williams. Both franchises have added an ace and a closer, though they’ve done it through different means. Are one side’s acquisitions clearly better than the other? Let’s start with the acquisition costs. The Red Sox only surrendered money to sign Chapman, giving him a one-year, $10.75-million contract. As for Crochet, Boston dealt four top-15 prospects — Teel, outfielder Braden Montgomery, infielder Chase Meidroth, and pitcher Wikelman Gonzalez — and they’ll have him under team control for his final two years of arbitration. The Yankees, on the other hand, gave Fried a whopper of a contract: $218 million over eight years. They paid a comparatively smaller price in their trade, losing out on just one season of Nestor Cortes Jr. and second base prospect Caleb Durbin in exchange for one year of Williams. Starting with the relievers, Williams is obviously better than a 37-year-old version of Aroldis Chapman, but they’re not being brought in to fill the exact same roles. Williams will be the unquestioned closer in New York. Over the last three seasons, he’s run a 1.66 ERA and 2.29 FIP in 141 innings, with a 39.5% strikeout rate and 48.3% groundball rate. Just take a look at his Statcast page, and you’ll start getting sick of the number 99. Chapman, meanwhile, has only racked up 20 saves over the past two seasons, with numbers that are more “great” than “best in the league. He's run a 3.45 ERA and 2.78 FIP, with a 39.1% strikeout rate but a sky-high 14.6% walk rate. With both relievers under contract for one year, the Yankees are going to get more juice for their squeeze, but does that offset the larger cost they paid? You could probably argue that it does, especially since their bullpen was in flux after losing Clay Holmes in free agency. Still, Chapman is no pushover, nor is he a stranger to the ultra-competitive AL East. As for the starters, Crochet and Fried exist on a similar tier. Fried has a longer track record of success, but he’s never had the putaway stuff the 25-year-old Crochet possesses. The former Atlanta Braves starter is a master of inducing soft contact and groundballs. He throws seven different pitches, and can retire a batter with any of them. On the other hand, Crochet's sinker is one of the very best in baseball, and his 35.1% strikeout rate was the best among all starters in 2024. However, he’s susceptible to giving up hard contact, doesn’t have a deep repertoire of pitches, and has never exceeded 150 innings pitched in a season (something Fried has done four times). Fried’s deal is fascinating because he’ll turn 31 before it even starts and he'll spent the rest of his career in New York. Crochet won’t even be 26 until the middle of next season, but the Red Sox will have to pay handsomely if they want to keep him beyond the 2026 season. Is one pitcher significantly better than the other? Despite pitching very differently, they get similar results, but would you rather be paying a 38-year-old Fried $27.25 million in 2030, or would you rather watch Crochet walk away before he’s even really in his prime? Perhaps the more interesting takeaway from all of this is that both of these teams pivoted to pitching after losing out on Soto. The Red Sox were always going to have to reinforce a pitching staff that lacked impact talent, but the Yankees chose to pivot in this particular direction hard. If you believe what's been reported, they effectively stole Fried from Boston by offering him an eighth year. Their pitching staff will be among the league's best in 2024, but they may find it challenging to score runs with an offense that consists of Aaron Judge, Cody Bellinger, Giancarlo Stanton, and a whole bunch of question marks. If nothing else, this offseason has breathed new life back into baseball’s oldest rivalry. Only time will tell which side made the better calls, but next season should offer a prominent look into which side is pulling ahead.
  25. The Yankees and Red Sox have mirrored each other’s moves this winter, with no clear winner between them, yet. Let’s get this out of the way up front: New York and Boston haven’t had identical offseasons. The Yankees actually lost Juan Soto, whereas the Red Sox merely failed to sign him. And the Bronx Bombers have also added to their offense, acquiring Cody Bellinger in a swap with the Chicago Cubs, whereas the Red Sox have only brought in backup catcher Carlos Narváez to replace the departing Kyle Teel…in a trade with the Yankees. Besides that, though, these two longtime rivals have mirrored each other closely in how they’ve chosen to operate this winter. The Red Sox signed Aroldis Chapman (before Soto’s deal became official) and traded for Garrett Crochet, while the Yankees signed Max Fried and traded for Devin Williams. Both franchises have added an ace and a closer, though they’ve done it through different means. Are one side’s acquisitions clearly better than the other? Let’s start with the acquisition costs. The Red Sox only surrendered money to sign Chapman, giving him a one-year, $10.75-million contract. As for Crochet, Boston dealt four top-15 prospects — Teel, outfielder Braden Montgomery, infielder Chase Meidroth, and pitcher Wikelman Gonzalez — and they’ll have him under team control for his final two years of arbitration. The Yankees, on the other hand, gave Fried a whopper of a contract: $218 million over eight years. They paid a comparatively smaller price in their trade, losing out on just one season of Nestor Cortes Jr. and second base prospect Caleb Durbin in exchange for one year of Williams. Starting with the relievers, Williams is obviously better than a 37-year-old version of Aroldis Chapman, but they’re not being brought in to fill the exact same roles. Williams will be the unquestioned closer in New York. Over the last three seasons, he’s run a 1.66 ERA and 2.29 FIP in 141 innings, with a 39.5% strikeout rate and 48.3% groundball rate. Just take a look at his Statcast page, and you’ll start getting sick of the number 99. Chapman, meanwhile, has only racked up 20 saves over the past two seasons, with numbers that are more “great” than “best in the league. He's run a 3.45 ERA and 2.78 FIP, with a 39.1% strikeout rate but a sky-high 14.6% walk rate. With both relievers under contract for one year, the Yankees are going to get more juice for their squeeze, but does that offset the larger cost they paid? You could probably argue that it does, especially since their bullpen was in flux after losing Clay Holmes in free agency. Still, Chapman is no pushover, nor is he a stranger to the ultra-competitive AL East. As for the starters, Crochet and Fried exist on a similar tier. Fried has a longer track record of success, but he’s never had the putaway stuff the 25-year-old Crochet possesses. The former Atlanta Braves starter is a master of inducing soft contact and groundballs. He throws seven different pitches, and can retire a batter with any of them. On the other hand, Crochet's sinker is one of the very best in baseball, and his 35.1% strikeout rate was the best among all starters in 2024. However, he’s susceptible to giving up hard contact, doesn’t have a deep repertoire of pitches, and has never exceeded 150 innings pitched in a season (something Fried has done four times). Fried’s deal is fascinating because he’ll turn 31 before it even starts and he'll spent the rest of his career in New York. Crochet won’t even be 26 until the middle of next season, but the Red Sox will have to pay handsomely if they want to keep him beyond the 2026 season. Is one pitcher significantly better than the other? Despite pitching very differently, they get similar results, but would you rather be paying a 38-year-old Fried $27.25 million in 2030, or would you rather watch Crochet walk away before he’s even really in his prime? Perhaps the more interesting takeaway from all of this is that both of these teams pivoted to pitching after losing out on Soto. The Red Sox were always going to have to reinforce a pitching staff that lacked impact talent, but the Yankees chose to pivot in this particular direction hard. If you believe what's been reported, they effectively stole Fried from Boston by offering him an eighth year. Their pitching staff will be among the league's best in 2024, but they may find it challenging to score runs with an offense that consists of Aaron Judge, Cody Bellinger, Giancarlo Stanton, and a whole bunch of question marks. If nothing else, this offseason has breathed new life back into baseball’s oldest rivalry. Only time will tell which side made the better calls, but next season should offer a prominent look into which side is pulling ahead. View full article
×
×
  • Create New...