You would also hate to have a six game streak of one run losses caused by 7th and 8th inning rallies in which you never called in the cavalry.
I think that, given all the analytics and data, there is going to be a more sophisticated usage of your best relievers from now on then "when it's technically a save op, 1-3 run lead," etc.
Managers and pitching coaches and relief pitchers, I know, love that....there are roles, no one has to get second-guessed in a media scrum when you lose one. But the REALITY is.....
Say, you have two top guns, one righty fireballer, one lefty groundballer, each who you are fine getting four outs but don't want to stretch to two innings.....and your starter runs into trouble in the middle of the seventh. Now, you could just go "setup guy!" even if there are three reverse platoons coming up who have bizarrely killed him over his otherwise stellar career. That's the current methodology.
Or you put your beanies on, figure out shifts and batter tendencies and who they have on their bench, days of rest and park factors and all that cr@p, and some guy that looks like Radar O'Reilly texts you the correct call from the bowels of the clubhouse.
You know that is the way it HAS to be in the near future. The public and media are too well informed. Even if you go against the numbers and win, there is going to be a big analysis with a whiff of "he was lucky."
Once Pandora's Box was opened and teams started breaking the stereotype closer title, this is the inevitable, and correct, path.
Once someone starts quoting Tony LaRussa as to the personality aspect of something that goes against the numbers, that argument is deader than the reputation of Grady Little's gut.