Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

TedWilliams101

Verified Member
  • Posts

    5,829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TedWilliams101

  1. Hey, at least its better than watching Pac Man.
  2. For the love of god, Julian. We need to score f***ing runs with Tavarez on the mound!
  3. Come on JT. Damn it. We need a bigger lead.
  4. 0-2 to Inge, here comes another walk...
  5. damn it. 0-2 and he walks him. Come on.
  6. Man, we need to start making him pay. Come on sox, start get big hits.
  7. Come on Coco, you can do better than that.
  8. Corners, 2 down. Lets go Mike Lowell. Gets some Ribbies here.
  9. Dat a boy Manny. 1-0. Lets just hope this isn't a repeat of yesterday. Lol
  10. There we go Coco. Lets get some momentum.
  11. We should probably make a new thread cause the lineups might be altered due to the doubleheader.
  12. I'm not saying that Maroth is a terrible pitcher or even that he pitched terribly against the Red Sox. All I'm saying is that it is a fact that he got smacked around by the Red Sox. It doesn't matter if it all came in one inning because of mismanagement or if he was having a slump. It happened, the Red Sox were able to score runs against him. Period. Everything you just wrote are excuses, sure some might have substance, but they are excuses, they don't change the fact that the Red Sox have had success against Maroth. Now that doesn't mean they will have success against him tonight, and that is where sample sizes come into effect.
  13. CrespBlows, the Red Sox HAVE owned Maroth. Thats a fact. It doesn't matter that he had only 7 starts against us. It is a FACT that the Red Sox hit him well throughout all of those starts. We're not arguing that Maroth is a terrible pitcher because of those 7 starts, we are saying that the Red Sox have done well against him, which they have. And the Bonds comparison is just wrong. If Bonds faced a pitcher in 7 games, let'ssay he had 15 At-Bats, and only managed 1 single with 8 strike outs. It would be a fact that the pitcher had owned Bonds. It doesn't matter what the condition is. The fact would be that Bonds didn't do well against him. Again, thats not saying that Bonds is a bad hitter or that the pitcher is Cy Young, its simply saying that Bonds hadn't had success against the pitcher. That has NOTHING to do with Sample Sizes.
  14. Ouch, the Tigers really have had great success against Tavarez. This is going to be a tough game.
  15. Sample sizes are irrelevant to the fact that he hasn't pitched well vs the sox. That is a fact. In the few starts that he has made he got knocked around. Sample sizes have nothing to do with that. You're using sample sizes incorrectly. It would be incorrect to believe that he was a terrible pitcher because of his performances vs the Red Sox, and that would be incorrect because of the small sample size. But that isn't what he is saying. He simply said that Maroth has had a bad history against the Red Sox and is hoping for that to continue. I also think that Maroth is better than he was in '03, but not significantly. He's mediocre and I think the Red Sox will be able to do some damage against him, or at least drive his pitch count up so he is out of the game early. And I wouldn't call Tavarez a terrible pitcher. He's bellow average for sure, but as #5 starter for the Red Sox, it's fine. He certainly is good enough to give the Red Sox a good shot at winning. It will be up to the offense though.
  16. Just win. I don't care how. Just do it.
  17. Game over, series tied 1-1
  18. Spark to another rally? Please...
  19. What, JD is going broke-back?
×
×
  • Create New...