Kilo, nice new av my friend.
In terms of Wang, I consider him in a completely new light. He is brilliant. I like to hear what other players think of a pitcher. For instance, after Irabu beat Detroit in his debut, the tigers hitters said that he has okay stuff, but is nothing better than average compared to the league. They were right. When asked about Wang, most players say he is like trying to hit a 95mph bowling ball. They cannot lift it. So why bother going for the K's? If nobody can lift the ball, he doesnt worry about getting hurt with the HR, so he pitches to contact. What I find interesting, is that he can rear back and get the K when he needs to.Half of his K's are with runners on, while he had 170 less ABs with runners on. He can get he K at times when he most needs it. But he is smart. A K guarantees at least 3 pitches to a hitter. While a groundout could be just one. Hence, he lasts a ton longer.
In essence, I expect over time for one of his secondary pitches to develop to a plus level. He has a nice changeup and a very nice slider, but they are so inconsistent that he ditches them when he gets to crunch time. I expect the K's to rise is what I am trying to say. He averaged nearly a K per inning as a minor leaguer until he learned the sinker at the end of 2004. So he has the stuff to miss bats. But when you have a 95+mph sinker that moves like crazy and is impossible to lift, why not just stick with it?
I understand those who are married to stats and say that everyone regresses to the mean. This was right about Chacon, Small, et al. But those guys have mediocre stuff who essentially got lucky in a short span of time. Wang obviously has amazing stuff. Players cannot lift it, players can hardly center it, so why change? He'll be just as good as that sinker is. If you see that thing biting at 95, then he will be just as good next yr, maybe better. If that sinker aint biting or loses speed, then he will get a lot worse.