Jump to content
Talk Sox
  • Create Account

TheKilo

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,914
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Boston Red Sox Videos

2026 Boston Red Sox Top Prospects Ranking

Boston Red Sox Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2025 Boston Red Sox Draft Pick Tracker

News

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TheKilo

  1. The only pitcher I would expect a regression from is Burnett. That's really it.
  2. *head explodes*
  3. That's not what you said though, you said "The Yankees will lose this weekend because the Angels are their Kryptonite". I don't think we lose this series. I think we split.
  4. Honest question - how much do you expect this rotation to regress?
  5. Why would this be awesome?
  6. What did I say that makes me a Chicken Little Sox fan? I don't understand - still waiting for someone to refute what I have said in the thread.
  7. "The Angels are the Yankee's Kryptonite" You think the Angels will win this weekend based on what they've done over the last decade. That's what I mean when I say past performance will not bear out future results. You can't assume something will happen just because it's happened in the past.
  8. If you're going to burn Papelbon in the 9th, why wouldn't you start the inning with him, thereby saving Masterson for 10-12?
  9. Because he's gotten the chance.
  10. They have glaring holes that need fixing or they will be on the outside looking in come October.
  11. Trade for Brandon Wood.
  12. Do you really not get what I am trying to say? What does the Angels team of 2002 have to do with this year's squad? What does the Twins team of 2003 have to do with this year's team? Holy f*** between arguing with you and Dojji I feel an aneurysm coming on.
  13. Liriano is better than Hochevar.
  14. No, all I'm saying is don't bank on them being the solution, either.
  15. Am I supposed to be happy with the way the team is playing right now? Honest question. I know I have you beat in the argument when you resort to childish tactics such as these. Forgive me if I don't have the rose-colored glasses on.
  16. When you say "The Angels are the Yankees Kryptonite" or "The Angels are the most successful team this decade" or "The Twins have gone 12-40 against the Yankees since 2002" you're projecting future results based on past performance. With individual players, fine. But you're doing it with teams is my point.
  17. No, he's better than Hochevar
  18. But when Lowell and Lowrie come back, we're assured they'll fix what's wrong with this team right? We're positive Lowell's hip won't flare up and Lowrie's wrist won't shatter?
  19. So, for those watching the postgame, is Tito saying what great pitches MDC and Masterson made, but they just got unlucky?
  20. They beat a better pitcher, from a better team, on the road. and once again, PAST PERFORMANCE DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH FUTURE RESULTS
  21. Jacoby's the only Red Sox regular hitting .300, so by your logic should he be hitting higher in the order?
  22. They had Nick Swisher batting 2nd
  23. we cant trade our pitching depth!!11
×
×
  • Create New...