That's not what you said though, you said "The Yankees will lose this weekend because the Angels are their Kryptonite".
I don't think we lose this series. I think we split.
"The Angels are the Yankee's Kryptonite"
You think the Angels will win this weekend based on what they've done over the last decade.
That's what I mean when I say past performance will not bear out future results.
You can't assume something will happen just because it's happened in the past.
Do you really not get what I am trying to say?
What does the Angels team of 2002 have to do with this year's squad?
What does the Twins team of 2003 have to do with this year's team?
Holy f*** between arguing with you and Dojji I feel an aneurysm coming on.
Am I supposed to be happy with the way the team is playing right now? Honest question.
I know I have you beat in the argument when you resort to childish tactics such as these.
Forgive me if I don't have the rose-colored glasses on.
When you say "The Angels are the Yankees Kryptonite" or "The Angels are the most successful team this decade" or "The Twins have gone 12-40 against the Yankees since 2002" you're projecting future results based on past performance.
With individual players, fine. But you're doing it with teams is my point.
But when Lowell and Lowrie come back, we're assured they'll fix what's wrong with this team right?
We're positive Lowell's hip won't flare up and Lowrie's wrist won't shatter?