okay, while Robertson's ERA is good, his record shows he can be hit. Verland COULD be a dominant pitcher in a few years or two, but i would never give a rookie that title. Papelbon PROBABLY will be a dominant pitcher. Liriano PROBABLY will be a dominant pitcher. Weaver PROBABLY will be a dominant pitcher. but i'm not giving that title to a rookie. who's to say any of them aren't one hit wonders? verlander has been riding a nice wave, but could hit a wall. maybe it will start tonight. and bonderman is very good too, but i also remember when he was kind of bad. yes, Bonderman CAN be dominant. Verlander CAN be dominant. hell, Beckett CAN be dominant. but of them all, only schilling has maintained a high level over a long career. and yes, i know he's a lot older. verlander has not had a good game against a really good opponent. he is 0-3 against the white sox with a 9.88 ERA. he is 0-1 against Anaheim. 1-1 against Oakland. he didnt get the loss against the yanks, but his ERA is over 10. given that track record, you would think the sox will crush him tonight. bonderman hasn't had the same results, but has got shelled once or twice, most notably by Cincy. and i dont buy the 'different red sox' malarchy. if the red sox could do it in june, they can do it in august. it is pretty much the same lineup. just because they aren't doing well, doesnt mean they wont, and we've seen what they can do when they're on their game. it's the beauty of sports, you just never know. like who would have said we would get swept by KC? but we went out, barely showed up, and they beat us. we could sweep we could get swept. all i'm saying is i think we're putting detroit on a higher pedestal than they are worth right now. this is a team that hasnt really struggled this year, and almost every team does at some point. maybe this is detroit's time. it's a long season, and while detroit has been really good for the first 2/3, doesnt mean they'll stay that way for the last 1/3.