I wish I could trust Salty enough to give up Lavs but would we be that surprised if Salty just had a version of 2011 in 2012? The difference is that Salty is swinging for the fences every swing this year. That is actually the best approach Salty can have for his plate appearances. So, I like it. However, at least to this point it does not appear to have made a difference as far as Salty's hot and cold hitting profile.
Since that disastrous defensive game for Salty, the one where Cook got injured, Salty's defense seems to have been better. He could still give his pitchers a better target and he still seems to lunge after balls in the dirt.
I still think we are going back in time now that the steroid era is behind us. There will be even more emphasis on pitching and defense again with the really prime defensive positions manned by guys that are not defensive liabilities. Those are SS, C and CF.
Non-steroid boosted baseball is baseball where you end up manufacturing more runs, pushing more runs across and preventing the other team from doing the same. Errors are more painful with less opportunity for some big boomer to come up and hit you a three run HR. In that sense maybe Lavs is still the better choice since I think most people think Lavs has more defensive upside than Salty.
I suppose I would not close off a discussion involving Lavs and maybe it would depend on what else they would want for Garza. Lavs alone sure as hell would not get it done.