Register now to remove this ad

Page 25 of 28 FirstFirst ... 152324252627 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 375 of 407

Thread: Trades?

  1. #361
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    82,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxbialystock View Post
    Finally you agree with me. I've been saying that for a month--that DD was about to break the bank at monte carlo--and that's why JH dumped him.
    DD almost traded Betts, so there is some evidence he was doing what JH wanted, probably not liking it. He did not replace K and K, which is more evidence he might have been willing to stick around through the massive cuts, but I don’t think he liked it, at all.

    To me, that was a source of friction. DD was not “about to break the bank,” because JH writes the checks.

    IMO, DD would not have liked being the GM in 2020, and JH did not view DD as the type of GM with an expertise of building winners with cheap budgets and no serious farm infusions for a 5 year period.

    That’s when JH decided to go for a GM that was thought to be good at building winners on low budgets.

    I’m not sure what you mean by “finally” seeing it your way. This has been my opinion for over5 years and seems to differ a bit from yours.

    I do not think DD would have spent more than bloom did, because JH would never have let him. JH actually started restricting spending shortly after the Sale and Bogey extensions and Nate re-up deal.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  2. #362
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by dgalehouse View Post
    Sox relief pitching: 2018- 46 saves. 20 blown saves. 2019: 33 saves. 31 blown saves. From a plus 26 to a plus 2. As usual, I will supply the facts. You will supply the spin and the " context" (aka excuses)
    Also,

    2018: Sale, Price, Porcello, Eovaldi combined for 579 IP
    2019: Sale, Price, Porcello, Eovaldi combined for 497 IP

    That’s a lot to ask the bullpen to make up…

  3. #363
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    A few more facts,

    2019 bullpen: 665 IP, 4.14 FIP/4.40 ERA, 10.5K/9, 5.6 fWAR
    2018 bullpen: 561 IP, 3.90 FIP/3.72 ERA, 9.6K/9, 4.1 fWAR

    “Spin” is looking at saves and blown saves and pretending it measures bullpen performance…
    Saves and blown saves is an indication of games won and games lost. That is what matters the most. ERA is a gauge of effectiveness. I honestly don't know what fWAR . is. Nor do I care. But if you can save fewer games and blow more saves and have a higher ERA, and still wind up with a better fWAR , then I would have to question it's worth.
    Old school is good school.

  4. #364
    All-Star ****THEYANKEES's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    864
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    "Falling in the standings" - sure, let's make it sound more dramatic than it really was. It was one bad season, no more, no less. And not as bad as some other Red Sox seasons Henry has been witnessing.

    DD had inked Bogaerts to an extension through 2022, so that's wrong too.
    no shit. and lets not forget DD had just led the Sox to three straight AL East titles for the FIRST TIME in history AND a WOrld Series Championship in 2018. one off year and you fire the guy. unfuckingreal. like you said, i think he's the most mercurial, egotistical POS owner since Frankensteinbrenner.

  5. #365
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by dgalehouse View Post
    Saves and blown saves is an indication of games won and games lost. That is what matters the most. ERA is a gauge of effectiveness. I honestly don't know what fWAR . is. Nor do I care. But if you can save fewer games and blow more saves and have a higher ERA, and still wind up with a better fWAR , then I would have to question it's worth.
    Saves are wins but blown saves are kind of meaningless. First of all, they’re not necessarily losses. Second, you can get multiple blown saves in a game. And really, a relief pitcher can be effective but still get a blown save, thanks to inherited runners. Not to mention, a pitcher can be credited with a blown save in almost any inning and didn’t need to give up an earned run to get one. Ryan Brasier was credited with a blown save in the fifth inning when he was in Boston. How is that indicative of a win or a loss?

    The reason that fWAR was better was the similar FIP (unless you like blaming pitchers for weak defense) over the 100+ more innings pitched. That’s a huge chunk of innings, and a big reason the 2019 team didn’t do as well. The starters were more of a problem than the bullpen that year…

  6. #366
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    82,728
    Quote Originally Posted by dgalehouse View Post
    Saves and blown saves is an indication of games won and games lost. That is what matters the most. ERA is a gauge of effectiveness. I honestly don't know what fWAR . is. Nor do I care. But if you can save fewer games and blow more saves and have a higher ERA, and still wind up with a better fWAR , then I would have to question it's worth.
    You mention WAR a lot, for someone who doesn’t care.

    In short, IP is a big factor in the total value of a pitcher or pen, as it should have value.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  7. #367
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    Also,

    2018: Sale, Price, Porcello, Eovaldi combined for 579 IP
    2019: Sale, Price, Porcello, Eovaldi combined for 497 IP

    That’s a lot to ask the bullpen to make up…
    It’s pretty well known that a taxed bullpen is a less effective bullpen. And I think everyone in here would agree with that. Of course a good bullpen is also reliant on…..well a good bullpen.

  8. #368
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    You mention WAR a lot, for someone who doesn’t care.

    In short, IP is a big factor in the total value of a pitcher or pen, as it should have value.

    There’s also a reasonable chance dgalehouse thinks all blown saves occur in the ninth inning. And are losses…

  9. #369
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    There’s also a reasonable chance dgalehouse thinks all blown saves occur in the ninth inning. And are losses…
    Many blown saves do turn into wins, and involve relief innings where pitchers performed well.

    There’s also high leverage relief situation in innings where you don’t have the lead.

    All stats on their own are incomplete, and can’t tell you everything.

  10. #370
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    The stupidest thing about blown saves is that they include inherited runners. If you come in with a 1 run lead, bases loaded and no outs and retire the side allowing one run to score, you're credited with:

    -A scoreless inning.
    -(Anecdotally) a great job.
    -A blown save.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  11. #371
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    The stupidest thing about blown saves is that they include inherited runners. If you come in with a 1 run lead, bases loaded and no outs and retire the side allowing one run to score, you're credited with:

    -A scoreless inning.
    -(Anecdotally) a great job.
    -A blown save.
    There are so many situational examples of why blown saves carry the appropriate abbreviation of BS.

    And even saves themselves are corrupted, because any pitcher who pitches the last 3 innings of a game without blowing a lead of any size is credited with a save…

  12. #372
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    The stupidest thing about blown saves is that they include inherited runners. If you come in with a 1 run lead, bases loaded and no outs and retire the side allowing one run to score, you're credited with:

    -A scoreless inning.
    -(Anecdotally) a great job.
    -A blown save.
    You can kind of make the argument that a blown save is a team stat

  13. #373
    how did we get to blown saves on this thread?

  14. #374
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Red Sox View Post
    how did we get to blown saves on this thread?
    All our threads eventually become catchall threads.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  15. #375
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh2 View Post
    Many blown saves do turn into wins, and involve relief innings where pitchers performed well.

    There’s also high leverage relief situation in innings where you don’t have the lead.

    All stats on their own are incomplete, and can’t tell you everything.
    I went thru the game logs for the 2019 bullpen.

    I found 29 of their blown saves. Their record in those 29 games - 13 wins 16 losses.

    Granted, I never went thru to see if any games had multiple blown saves. That’s too much to ask.

    But with that bullpen, a blown save is not an indicator of a loss…

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •