Register now to remove this ad

Page 3 of 24 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 360

Thread: 2024 Red Sox Defense

  1. #31
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    82,690
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    You can check FanGraphs too.
    I can and did, but he played 0 games, last season, and only 34 in 2022, so he is a 2 years older than that, now. He's started less than 175 200 games at SS in the past 4 years, combined. Whatever fangraphs says about that sample size may be near meaningless.

    I'll pass. There should be someone better on D, just as cheap and maybe with more upside on O.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  2. #32
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    42,923
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxbialystock View Post
    I certainly thought our defense had improved this year--and said so, mostly because the pitching has been spectacularly good, the best in MLB after just 10 games.

    But guess what? 9 of the 22 runs scored against the Sox were unearned. That to me bespeaks lousy defense--and the fact that Story played excellent defense at SS could not prevent the bungles by the likes of Rafaela, Abreu, Reyes, Casas, Devers, and Valdez.

    Of those errors, to me the most forgivable one was by Devers, who had to deal with one of those in between high-hoppers, which he tried to grab while going backwards.

    Rafaela's error was on a dead easy fly he decided to go casual on. Same goes for Abreu on an easy grounder single he let get through his legs. Same for Casas--of course Casas--on another easy grounder. Same for Valdez on a throw to 2b, which he dropped.

    Also, let's not forget that, while I think we can all agree Trevor Story is superb on defense, at 2b or SS, he can't stay healthy. I hasten to add he's getting paid $22M/year primarily for hitting, which he has yet to do.

    Speaking of hitting, I don't see a whole lot of them in next year's hypothetical all-defensive team. I think I see 3: Devers, Casas, and Duran--and the latter two are probables, not certainties.
    I disagree, and think you’re misinterpreting that stat.

    The 9 unearned runs aren’t what defines the defense; it’s also that the Sox have only given up 24 runs total. We like to attribute that solely to pitching, but defense absolutely is a factor. The Sox crazy low run total can’t be all pitching; not with all these guys back from last year.

    Defense isn’t measured just by the plays you don’t make. The ones you do makes are factors as well…

  3. #33
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    42,923
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    I can and did, but he played 0 games, last season, and only 34 in 2022, so he is a 2 years older than that, now. He's started less than 175 200 games at SS in the past 4 years, combined. Whatever fangraphs says about that sample size may be near meaningless.

    I'll pass. There should be someone better on D, just as cheap and maybe with more upside on O.

    The Angels just DFA’d Liván Soto. He might not be a bad idea…

  4. #34
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67,865
    Quote Originally Posted by A Red Sox fan named Hugh View Post
    The drop off in CF to Duran is not as bad as the drop off at SS to Hamilton/others.

    Also I think it's a mischaraterization to say "not great" he's defense has been characterized many times as plus at SS. He grew up playing SS, and continued playing it 1-2 times week while he's been in the minors in the Sox system.

    Sox may very well roll the dice with Hamilton at SS, but Rafaela is their best option there right now and IMO it's not even close.
    ^^^
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    I get MV Pee.

  5. #35
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67,865
    Quote Originally Posted by A Red Sox fan named Hugh View Post
    Ok, I will also go listen to their last podcast in which they advocate Rafaela at SS as their best option.

    http://news.soxprospects.com/2024/04...ary-story.html

    I would prefer Rafaela in CF, but right now, the team might be best with him at SS.

    EDIT. I don't advocate the move permanent, and I still think he should start 1-2 games a week in CF and have Pablo/Hamilton play SS.
    I'd prefer Rafaela stick in CF too, but they don't have another decent SS to plug in defensively.
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    I get MV Pee.

  6. #36
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67,865
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    The Angels just DFA’d Liván Soto. He might not be a bad idea…
    -4 OAA at SS.
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    I get MV Pee.

  7. #37
    Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    12,082
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    I'd prefer Rafaela stick in CF too, but they don't have another decent SS to plug in defensively.
    And the BIG question would be with Story’s history of getting hurt why not?

  8. #38
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,114
    I have confidence that Breslow can figure this out better than Bloom did.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  9. #39
    Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    12,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    I have confidence that Breslow can figure this out better than Bloom did.
    The fact that there isn’t one now is not a good sign.

  10. #40
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    The fact that there isn’t one now is not a good sign.
    It's hard to plan around your #1 guy at such a key position going down.

    They have to find out how long Story will be out and act accordingly.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  11. #41
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67,865
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    I have confidence that Breslow can figure this out better than Bloom did.
    100%.

    He traded for Slaten decisively.

    He wanted a 2b and got Grissom.

    They needed more starting pitcher prospects so he dealt Schreiber for Sandlin who is now one of the more hyped BA prospects.

    He wanted to get rid of Verdugo's contract so he dealt him to the Yanks for Fitts, Weissert and Judice.

    To replace Verdugo, he dealt Santos and Robertson for Tyler O'Neilll.

    That would have been too much work for Bloom for one offseason.
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    I get MV Pee.

  12. #42
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67,865
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    It's hard to plan around your #1 guy at such a key position going down.

    They have to find out how long Story will be out and act accordingly.
    He's still on the 10 day IL. No further updates?
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    I get MV Pee.

  13. #43
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,114
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    He's still on the 10 day IL. No further updates?
    More tests I think.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  14. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    I have confidence that Breslow can figure this out better than Bloom did.
    Molecular biophysics vs. the Illiad.

    Which one would most humans use to replace "rocket science" when blurting metaphors on difficult subjects they know nothing about?

    (Chaim says, "Don't sleep on Homer; 5Gs couldn't even finish The Canterbury Tales in college, because every other page was footnote translations")

  15. #45
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    67,865
    Quote Originally Posted by 5GoldGloves:OF,75 View Post
    Molecular biophysics vs. the Illiad.

    Which one would most humans use to replace "rocket science" when blurting metaphors on difficult subjects they know nothing about?

    (Chaim says, "Don't sleep on Homer; 5Gs couldn't even finish The Canterbury Tales in college, because every other page was footnote translations")
    Too much Whistle Pig for Bloom.
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    I get MV Pee.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •