Register now to remove this ad

Page 45 of 52 FirstFirst ... 354344454647 ... LastLast
Results 661 to 675 of 766

Thread: Chris Sale traded to Braves

  1. #661
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    82,724
    Quote Originally Posted by dgalehouse View Post
    People can have their own opinions. Their own beliefs. Their own ideologies. Their own preferences. Their own sources of information. And their own ideas of how to build a baseball team. But they should never let that replace what is the actual reality. And that often is what happens. Call it " context" , " spin" or whatever. But it does not change the reality. You can have a doctorate in physics or you can be a fourth grade arithmetic student, but two and two still makes four. And Chris Sale is a great pitcher, albeit an often injured one. Grissom is young , but is still an unproven prospect/suspect who is not close to being in Sale's league. And that is a reality.
    Does anyone disagree with this?
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  2. #662
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by dgalehouse View Post
    Okay, pal. We will have to check back in a few years. But today is happening now. The present.
    Absofuckinglutely, right now this trade doesn’t look good. Sale is much more valuable than Grissom.

    This trade is all about the future, and I think there are some of us who just don’t want to jump on the criticism wagon yet with that in mind.

    I do wonder if Breslow still makes this trade in hindsight given how Sale, and the Red Sox have performed this year.

  3. #663
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Here's a simple way to express why trading Sale was not a good idea:

    You don't trade off starting pitching unless you have a major surplus of it. The Red Sox clearly did not have a major surplus of it.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  4. #664
    Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    12,135
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh2 View Post
    Absofuckinglutely, right now this trade doesn’t look good. Sale is much more valuable than Grissom.

    This trade is all about the future, and I think there are some of us who just don’t want to jump on the criticism wagon yet with that in mind.

    I do wonder if Breslow still makes this trade in hindsight given how Sale, and the Red Sox have performed this year.
    As Cora keeps saying the future is right now 2024. I’d be very surprised if Grissom is penciled in as the Red Sox 2B for the next 5-6 yrs. Mayer is getting closer to possibly sometime next year, and you’ve still got 3 years left of Story Land’s contract. 2024 is what counts now, and 2025 can be worried about after this season is over.

  5. #665
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Red View Post
    As Cora keeps saying the future is right now 2024. I’d be very surprised if Grissom is penciled in as the Red Sox 2B for the next 5-6 yrs. Mayer is getting closer to possibly sometime next year, and you’ve still got 3 years left of Story Land’s contract. 2024 is what counts now, and 2025 can be worried about after this season is over.
    And how exactly does Grissom fit into a 2025 infield that has Story, Mayer and a number of other candidates?

    This trade makes less sense the more you think about it.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  6. #666
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    And how exactly does Grissom fit into a 2025 infield that has Story, Mayer and a number of other candidates?

    This trade makes less sense the more you think about it.
    it was ALL about dumping salary

  7. #667
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Red Sox View Post
    it was ALL about dumping salary
    Randy, that's all I can come up with too. It was all about that precious $10 million.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  8. #668
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    With Bello and Pivetta now looking like crap, we're down to Houck and Crawford as reliable starters. And those two are getting into uncharted territory innings-wise. They're already trying to get Houck a bit more rest.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  9. #669
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    Randy, that's all I can come up with too. It was all about that precious $10 million.
    Well, if it was about dumping salary, why give $17mill and take back Grissom when you can include less money and get back a lesser prospect? Because despite what you think, Grissom was a highly regarded prospect at the time.

    Also, if it was only about saving money, why spend on Giolito to replace Sale?

    It seems obvious the Red Sox did not buy into Sale pitching 43 innings without any sort of injury as the indication that his health problems were clearly over and he was going to be able to pitch a full season. With the money to get the better prospect plus the money spent on Giolito to replace Sale, they didn’t save money. In fact, they would up spending about $7mill more…

  10. #670
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    Well, if it was about dumping salary, why give $17mill and take back Grissom when you can include less money and get back a lesser prospect? Because despite what you think, Grissom was a highly regarded prospect at the time.

    Also, if it was only about saving money, why spend on Giolito to replace Sale?
    Pretty simple. Breslow wanted to sign Giolito, but he couldn't do that, keep Sale and make his other desired moves and stay within the budget he was given.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  11. #671
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    Pretty simple. Breslow wanted to sign Giolito, but he couldn't do that, keep Sale and make his other desired moves and stay within the budget he was given.
    But why take back Grissom when you can include less money and take back a lesser prospect?

  12. #672
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    We all expected them to add starting pitching. What they actually did was subtract one and add one. And the guy they added had a 4.9 ERA over the last 2 seasons.

    It was one more amazingly underwhelming offseason in the starting pitching department.

    Of course the rotation got off to a great start this year and Bailey seemed to be a magician. But the magic has been wearing off.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  13. #673
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    But why take back Grissom when you can include less money and take back a lesser prospect?
    Only Breslow knows all the whys and wherefores. Obviously somebody thought highly of Grissom.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  14. #674
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    43,032
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    We all expected them to add starting pitching. What they actually did was subtract one and add one. And the guy they added had a 4.9 ERA over the last 2 seasons.

    It was one more amazingly underwhelming offseason in the starting pitching department.

    Of course the rotation got off to a great start this year and Bailey seemed to be a magician. But the magic has been wearing off.

    So what was the point of dropping Sale to add Giolito? Clearly not to save money, since keeping Sale was $7mill cheaper.

    It seems to obvious to point out, but just because WE expected them to add starting pitching didn’t mean it was on their radar. And this Sale/Giolito swap also points out they really didn’t add anything. They swapped out two plsyers and spent money to do it…
    Last edited by notin; Yesterday at 09:08 AM.

  15. #675
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    48,173
    Red Sox team ERA by month:

    March-April 2.62
    May 4.12
    June 4.33
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •