Sanchez helped the Jets reach the AFC championship game, turning in a 92.7 passer rating in three playoff games, including a 139.4 mark in the wild-card round during his first year in the NFL.Originally Posted by Emmz;592663;
Sanchez helped the Jets reach the AFC championship game, turning in a 92.7 passer rating in three playoff games, including a 139.4 mark in the wild-card round during his first year in the NFL.
Projecting what a rookie QB will be in five years is somewhat foolish since his development, performance, and perceived quality is largely contingent on how his team performs.
But, right now, Bradford.
Yeah, but Sanchez is such a liability that he'd almost be better off on the PUP list. The guy just flat out sucks ass. He has tons of weapons and he still can't do it. But yeah, Stafford has loads of potential if he can play a full season consistently.
And three of these guys are not rookies.
Make that four.
Yeah I just didn't think of another word at the time, I supposed I could've said "young" instead
Passer rating? Really? That argument doesn't fly. The only reason he had a 139 mark is because he threw 15 passes. Would you rather have a guy go for 185 yards on 12/15 completions with 1 TD and 0 INT or someone who throws for 300 yards, 20/30 completions, 3 TD and 1 INT, because if you picked the first guy, he has a higher QB rating, but obviously doesn't compare to the second guy.
He had games of 182 yards, 100 yards and 257 yards, with 60% completion rate, 2 interceptions and 4 TDs. That, and the fact that you're using a sample size of three games (where he was put on a short leash, btw) to compare to what Flacco's done much better for the last two years.
Passer rating isn't everything but when you compare a 92.7 passer rating in 3 playoffs games to a 46.5 passer rating in 5 playoff games, which guy are you more likely to choose?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote